NRC Public Meeting on Holtec High-Level Radioactive Waste Storage Project – 85% of Speakers Oppose
UPDATE 5/11/2018
Since the meeting in Carlsbad, NM, because of public pressure, the NRC has both scheduled two additional public meetings and extended the public comment period from May 29th to July 30th.
-
The May 21 meeting will be held at the Gallup Downtown Conference Center, 204 W. Coal Ave., in Gallup.
(UPDATE: 30 people spoke in at the Gallup public meeting all but one (a HOLEC employee) spoke in opposition to the proposed site)
-
The May 22 meeting will be held at the Crown Plaza Hotel, 1901 University Blvd., in Albuquerque.
(UPDATE: Over 200 people show up to the Albuquerque NRC meeting. 69 people spoke in total— 63 shared their opposition. Only 6 people spoke in favor of it.)
Both meetings are scheduled to run from 6-9 p.m., with an open house beginning at 5 p.m., for members of the public to meet informally with NRC staff.
You can still submit a comment letter until July 30th to the NRC from our action page. This letter is editable by you. We are still hearing that the NRC site is working intermittently so this is an alternative way for you to comment on this proposed site. Even if you live outside New Mexico but may be concerned that high-level radioactive waste might be transported though your community from the 104 nuclear power plants around the country to the proposed site, you should voice your concerns.
UPDATE:
- A second public meeting was held Wednesday night in Hobbs, NM.
- The third public meeting was held Thusday night in Carlsbad, NM
- Due to conversations between citizens and the NRC after the Roswell meeting about the issues submitting comments via the NRC website, the NRC provided this email address as an alternative way for comment submission – Holtec-CISFEIS@nrc.gov
At the May 1 meeting in Hobbs, NM, 33 signed up and spoke in opposition to the Holtec proposed site. Only 13 spoke in favor of which there was a spokesperson from Holtec and one from ELEA. Others included the usual suspects (a few local state legislators and someone from the Chamber of Commerce as well as Xcel Energy, which owns two nuclear plants – Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant near Monticello, Minnesota, and Prairie Island Nuclear Generating Plant near Red Wing, Minnesota and currently stores the spent fuel from these nuclear plants on site in independent spent fuel storage installations. (ISFSIs). Both plants have licenses that run through 2033/34 and 2030, respectively and are probably hoping to have off site storage available when the plants are decommissioned). There is one final public meeting in Carlsbad this evening.
At the final May 3rd meeting in Carlsbad, NM, 34 citizens spoke in opposition and turned in 1300 comment letters opposing the siting of the Holtec proposed interim high level radioactive waste dump in New Mexico. Twenty seven spoke in favor of the proposal. One of these was pro-Yucca dump, pro-WIPP, and pro-nuke, but skeptical of Holtec.
In addition to the public comments on the proposal itself, at least one individual has pointed out issues with the process.
Specifically, the NRC has not had information in Spanish available before the hearings in this highly Hispanic, Low English Proficiency (LEP) area. This has been the subject of not only a Title VI complaint to EPA, a recent complaint to NMED, numerous comments on various facilities to NMED and to NRC as well as litigation. There is at least a 15 year history outlining the need for information in Spanish in this area. NRC should have been aware of this before even considering licensing a facility in Southeastern New Mexico and certainly before starting the public process for the Holtec application.
Questions were asked about Spanish outreach and public notice done by NRC in the state about these hearings and the licensing process for this facility? Was there any public notice in a language other than English? Without enhanced public notice in Spanish (and possibly in various Native languages as well as oral notice in communities where this is the primary way of communicating), a significant portion of the people of New Mexico have been left out of the public process for this facility. At this time there has been no detailed response from NRC to these questions.
A large portion of the people of the state will be impacted by the transportation phase of this project. More than 60% of the people of the state are Hispanic, Native American or African American and 35.7% of the population speaks a language other than English in the home. These New Mexicans should not have been eliminated from the public process for this facility.
Yesterday, April 30th, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) hosted an open house in Roswell, New Mexico on a controversial high-level radioactive waste storage project, proposed for a site between Hobbs and Carlsbad. The open house was followed by a public meeting which included an opportunity for public comment. There were over 95 in attendance, filling the room to capacity, causing the local fire marshall to close the doors to additional attendance. Community members from around the state showed up to oppose the storing of the nation’s high-level nuclear waste in southeast New Mexico.
There are many reasons for opposing this dangerous plan and 36 spoke in opposition citing various reasons for their objections that included:
- Concerns about the health, safety and financial impacts of this controversial high-level radioactive waste storage project on surrounding communities and communities along the transportation routes.
- Impact of potential contamination on local dairy and pecan farms, tourism and oil and gas industries that employ more than 15,000 people for a project promising just 55 local jobs
- It’s a train wreck waiting to happen. Over 10,000 overweight rail cars would carry this waste to the site, and the waste would likely go very near the Carlsbad sinkhole
- The federal government may never find a permanent place for this waste, potentially leaving it here forever in a site designed for temporary storage.
- This isn’t our waste, and we didn’t get the power from the nuclear reactors that produced it. Those near existing reactors know the risks and don’t want the waste. Why should we take it?
There were only 6 who spoke up in support of the proposal, one was a Holtec spokesperson and the other five were University of New Mexico nuclear engineering students.
Holtec seeks “interim” storage of the nation’s deadly high-level radioactive waste, which they anticipate will be for 120 years. An unsafe de facto permanent dump site could be created and the waste might never move again if there is no political will or inadequate funding in the future for a permanent waste site. The company plans to transport 10,000 canisters of irradiated reactor fuel rods from around the county and store them near the surface in New Mexico, inviting disaster and creating massive risks. This is more waste than has been created by all U.S. nuclear reactors to date.
“There is everything to lose with this plan to bring the nation’s high-level radioactive waste to New Mexico. The risks to health, safety, security and financial well-being are immense and people need to act now to stop this massive mistake that imperils people in New Mexico as well as along transport routes throughout the country,” said Karen Hadden, director of the Sustainable Energy and Economic Development (SEED) Coalition, who has been working with local opposition groups for months opposing this application and a similar one just across the border in Andrews County, Texas.
There are two other opportunities for New Mexican citizens to comment in a public forum
- Tuesday, May 1st Hobbs 7-10 pm Lea County Event Center, 5101 N. Lovington Highway
- Thursday, May 3rd Carlsbad 7-10 pm Eddy County Fire Service, 1400 Commerce Street
In addition, comments can also be submitted at www.regulations.gov, Docket ID NRC-2018-0052; or by mail, to May Ma, Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7– A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001.
Some folks have been having problems submitting their comments through the NRC website, but we have a request in to NRC to get an email address where folks can submit their comments directly. That update is at the top of this post.
You can visit these websites for more information on High-level radioactive waste: