Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Dan Hockensmith, Communications Officer (Global Trade Watch)
w. (202) 454-5108
dhockensmith@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

Dec. 2, 2010

A Day of Ethics – Rangel’s Problems Confirm the Need for the Independent Office of Congressional Ethics

Statement of Lisa Gilbert, Deputy Director, Public Citizen’s Congress Watch Division

Today’s events have put a spotlight on congressional ethics.

The same day that the U.S. House of Representatives voted to censure one if its most senior members over ethics violations, it also heard entreaties from 10 reform groups, including Public Citizen, to maintain an important ethics safeguard in the House: the independent Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE).

The events highlight a broader drama unfolding in Congress. Despite some shortcomings, the OCE is vastly improving compliance withthe ethics rules in Congress – and for that reason the OCE is coming under attack. The agency is in danger of being critically weakened, or even eliminated, when the new Republican majority rewrites the House ethics rules on Jan. 5.

A new Public Citizen analysis (available at http://www.citizen.org/documents/Disciplinary-actions3.pdf) shows a marked increase in activity by the House ethics committee in just the past two years. This activity stems in large part from the good work of the OCE, and that is why some in Congress want to shut it down.

The OCE undertook 69 preliminary reviews in 2009 and 2010, while the House ethics committee doled out 11 disciplinary actions in that same time, more than the total disciplinary actions taken by the committee in the previous decade. This does not mean there were more ethics violations in the past two years – just that there was more activity by the ethics committee. While the ethics committee slumbered in the previous decade, the Department of Justice filled the void with about 20 criminal prosecutions of scandals related to disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Now that the OCE is prompting the ethics committee to do its job, members and staff are on notice that the ethics rules will be enforced before they cross the line into criminal behavior. 

We urge the incoming leadership to make abundantly clear that they will preserve the OCE in its current form in the 112th Congress – and strengthen the agency by granting it authority to subpoena witnesses and evidence. The public deserves no less.

Although the case of Rep. Charles Rangel’s (D-N.Y.) ethics violations predates the OCE, the office’s work likely contributed to his prosecution by increasing awareness of and sensitivity to ethics abuses. The House vote to censure Rangel – the chamber’s most stringent form of punishment with the exception of expulsion – is the appropriate reaction to his ethics violations.


###

Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit public interest organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.citizen.org.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.