Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Nov. 4, 2013

Johnson & Johnson Settlement Nothing New for Company; Small Fine Unlikely to Prompt Change in Behavior

Statement of Sammy Almashat, Researcher, Public Citizen’s Health Research Group

Today’s announcement that Johnson & Johnson has agreed to plead guilty to several criminal charges and pay $2.2 billion in criminal and civil fines to the federal and state governments is the latest in a long line of multibillion-dollar health fraud settlements reached between the drug industry and the federal and state governments. The settlement ranks as the third-largest health fraud settlement ever reached between a pharmaceutical company and the federal government and comes just one year after GlaxoSmithKline’s record-breaking $3 billion agreement in July 2012.

Today’s settlement focused mostly ($1.7 billion of the $2.2 billion settlement) on Johnson & Johnson’s illegal off-label promotion of its blockbuster antipsychotic drug, Risperdal. The company paid a criminal fine of $400 million and pleaded guilty to marketing the drug to treat behavioral disturbances and psychotic symptoms in elderly patients without schizophrenia (at the time, the drug was approved only to treat schizophrenic symptoms). The company will also pay almost $1.3 billion in civil penalties to resolve allegations that it marketed the drug for use in the elderly, children and mentally disabled patients when it was not approved for any of the advertised uses.

The marketing campaigns were allegedly conducted in full knowledge that the drug increased the risk of diabetes, strokes in the elderly and breast enlargement in young boys, all of which its marketing teams allegedly downplayed in their sales pitches to doctors.

The government also claimed that the company repeatedly ignored warnings from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) against promoting the drugs in the targeted elderly populations and children.

Today’s settlement is nothing new for the company. According to a 2012 Public Citizen report, Johnson & Johnson racked up $2.3 billion in criminal and civil penalties for various allegations of wrongdoing from 1991 through July 18, 2012.

Johnson & Johnson’s status as a repeat offender demonstrates that despite the seemingly large sums, the fines imposed on pharmaceutical companies for dangerous and illegal conduct pale in comparison to the profits generated from such activity. Global sales of Risperdal totaled $24 billion between 2003 and 2010, ten times today’s settlement amount.

Until more meaningful penalties and the prospect of jail time for company heads who are responsible for such activity become common, companies will continue defrauding the government and putting patients’ lives in danger.


Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.