Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Dan Hockensmith, Communications Officer (Global Trade Watch)
w. (202) 454-5108
dhockensmith@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

September 11, 2013

Lawmakers Approve Flawed Bill That Would Burden Judiciary, Increase Litigation Costs

Statement of Christine Hines, Consumer and Civil Justice Counsel, Public Citizen

The deceptively named “Lawsuit Abuse Reduction Act” (H.R. 2655) would slow litigation and increase its costs by encouraging additional legal maneuvers and requiring unnecessary court orders. The bill was approved today by the House Judiciary Committee and next goes to the House floor for a full vote.

In practice, this legislation would harm ordinary people with valid and important claims. It is just another backdoor tactic employed by corporate lobbyists and their allies in Congress to make it difficult for consumers and employees to hold corporations accountable.

If passed, this bill would return the litigation process to a time when a former version of a court rule, commonly called “Rule 11,” was used by corporate defendants to prolong and create sideshow litigation. The old version of Rule 11 distracted from the real claims in lawsuits and increased the costs of already-expensive litigation. This bill would re-create a problem that was fixed years ago because it was found to unfairly penalize consumers and burden the judiciary.

Specifically, this bill would make sanctions mandatory if a court finds that a filing in a case is frivolous, effectively removing federal judges’ discretion to decide how to handle allegedly baseless lawsuits. It also removes the “safe harbor” provision from the current rule that gives lawyers the ability to correct or withdraw filings with the court if they might face a Rule 11 challenge. These rules have been proven in the past to harm consumer and civil rights litigation, and would be likely to do so again.

A judicial advisory body that ultimately revised Rule 11 concluded that the old method had wasted resources. The judiciary, as well as consumer, employment and civil rights groups, oppose H.R. 2655 because history shows that it would harm the legal system and impair individuals’ access to justice. The House should learn from the past and reject this abusive measure.

For more about this issue, see a July 22 letter written by Public Citizen and other public interest organizations to U.S. Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), chair of the House Judiciary Committee: http://www.citizen.org/documents/lawsuit-abuse-reduction-act-hr2655-opposition-letter.pdf

###
 

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.