Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Symone Sanders, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch division
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


April 25, 2013

Shareholder Protection Act Would Restore Responsible Governance to Corporate Political Spending Decisions

Endorsed by 39 Civic Groups, Institutional Investors and Transparency Organizations

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Shareholder Protection Act, reintroduced today by Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) and Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.), is critical legislation because it would bring responsible corporate governance to corporate political spending by involving shareholders in those spending decisions and keeping the public informed of them, a coalition of 39 groups said today.

“The U.S. Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision reversed decades of political tradition prohibiting direct corporate financing of elections and overnight made CEOs of wealthy businesses principal players in American elections,” said Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “Unless there are internal policies to the contrary, CEOs now can literally dip into the corporate till and spend that money without limit promoting or attacking candidates.”

The Shareholder Protection Act already has eight original co-sponsors in the Senate and 24 in the House of Representatives. Specifically, the act would:

  • Mandate prior approval by shareholders for an annual political expenditure budget chosen by the management for a publicly held corporation;
  • Require that each specific corporate political expenditure over a certain dollar threshold be approved by the board of directors and promptly disclosed to shareholders and the public;
  • Require that institutional investors inform all persons in their investment funds how they voted on corporate political expenditures; and
  • Post on the Securities and Exchange Commission website how much each corporation is spending on elections and which candidates or issues they support or oppose.

“Corporate treasuries should not be political play things for CEOs,” said Lisa Gilbert, director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “Responsible corporate governance requires informed shareholders, capable of holding management accountable and ensuring that spending decisions are made in the best interests of the business.”

The endorsing organizations are from diverse backgrounds, with concerns ranging from protecting the environment and preserving the bottom lines of businesses to ensuring transparency of money in elections.

“Responsible corporate governance requires the involvement of informed shareholders and is not a partisan issue,” noted the groups in a letter to Congress. “We believe that holding management accountable and ensuring that political spending decisions are made transparently and in pursuit of sound business is important for both the market and for democracy.”

To read the coalition endorsement letter of the Shareholder Protection Act, go to: http://www.citizen.org/documents/coalition-letter-supporting-shareholder-act-2013.pdf.

The coalition includes the following groups:

Brennan Center for Justice at N.Y.U. School of Law, Center for Media and Democracy, Chesapeake Climate Action Network, Citizen Works, Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), Coffee Party USA, Common Cause, Corporate Accountability International, Corporate Ethics International/Business Ethics Network, Democrats.com, Demos, Free Speech for People

Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Harrington Investments, Inc., Holy Cross International Justice Office, Illinois Campaign for Political Reform, Krull and Company, League of Conservation Voters, Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns, National Consumers League, New Progressive Alliance, North Carolina Center for Voter Engagement, NorthStar Asset Management, Inc., Ohio Citizen Action, People for the American Way, Progressive States Network, Public Campaign, Public Citizen, Service Employees International Union (SEIU), Social Equity Group, Ron Freund and Duncan Meaney, Strategic Counsel on Corporate Accountability, Sanford Lewis, Sunlight Foundation, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy, U.S. Public Interest Research Group (US PIRG), United Food and Commercial Workers, West Virginia Citizen Action, Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, Zevin Asset Management, LLC



Copyright © 2015 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.