Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


FDA Ignores Evidence Linking Wingspan Stent System to Stroke and Death, Keeps Dangerous Device on the Market

Statement of Dr. Sidney Wolfe, Director, Public Citizen’s Health Research Group

Note: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration today rejected Public Citizen’s Dec. 21, 2011 petition to ban the Wingspan Stent System.

In announcing the decision not to ban the Wingspan brain stent system, as Public Citizen had petitioned the agency to do last year, Dr. Jeff Shuren, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) director of the Center for Device and Radiologic Health, said that “Patient benefit is an important factor in agency decision-making.”

Given the findings of the Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) study, this statement misleadingly omits the fact that the patient benefits were clearly outweighed by the risks of the Wingspan Stent System in that study.

The SAMMPRIS was the only randomized controlled study on this device to compare the use of the Wingspan Stent System and aggressive medical management to aggressive medical management alone. Enrollment in the SAMMPRIS study was stopped because of a much higher 30-day rate of stroke or death in the Wingspan Stent group compared to the medical-management group (14.7 percent compared to 5.8 percent).

Thus, the evidence from this study showed that for every 11 patients treated with the Wingspan system and aggressive medical therapy, one additional patient dies or suffers a stroke within 30 days, compared to patients treated with aggressive medical therapy alone.

The FDA has largely ignored the findings of this important National Institutes of Health-funded study and has decided to allow this device to stay on the market where it is certain, despite labeling changes, to be used on patients similar to those in the SAMMPRIS study, because of the entirely predictable off-label uses that occur with such devices. Even for those patients getting the device according to the new labeling, it is not clear that the benefits outweigh the risks. This is further evidence that the agency is not making decisions in an evidence-based manner but, rather, stating that it believes the device will be beneficial, despite evidence to the contrary.

To view the original petition visit http://www.citizen.org/petition-to-fda-to-withdraw-approval-of-wingspan-stent-system-122111

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.