Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Symone Sanders, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch division
w. (202) 454-5108
ssanders@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

April 24, 2012

Got a Credit Card or Bank Account? Scrutiny of Forced Arbitration Is Good News

Statement of Christine Hines, Public Citizen’s Consumer and Civil Justice Counsel

We welcome today’s announcement that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) will study the impact of forced arbitration in consumer financial services contracts, as required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The agency’s decision to begin working on the issue is good news for anyone who has a credit card, short-term loan, bank account or other financial service contract.

The principal goal of forced arbitration is to prevent consumers from joining together in class actions, because in many instances it is not feasible for consumers to pursue claims on an individual basis. Class-action bans allow companies to rip off consumers with virtual impunity, so long as they take relatively small amounts of money from each person. Individual arbitrations tend to be biased against consumers and favor the companies that provide arbitrators with repeat business.

Forced arbitration clauses usually are slipped into the small type of the lengthy documents you get when you apply for a credit card or loan, buy a cell phone or download computer software. We have long said that forced arbitration unreasonably denies consumers the ability to pursue claims against corporate misconduct. Our previous reports have shown that consumers overwhelmingly are on the losing end of contracts and terms of service that contain arbitration clauses.

We expect that any fair examination of forced arbitration will conclude that the practice is devastatingly harmful to consumers. The most critical step, then, will be for the CFPB to ban forced arbitration, ensuring that arbitration is always voluntary for consumers – not a kangaroo court or a tool for law-breaking corporations to insulate themselves from accountability.

For our Forced Arbitration Rogues Gallery, visit http://pubc.it/RogueS.

For more information about forced arbitration, visit www.FairArbitrationNow.org.

###

Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.citizen.org. 

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.