Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Symone Sanders, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch division
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Nov. 5, 2003

If Dean Opts Out of the Public Finance System, He Should Stay Within Campaign Spending Limits Until Democratic Nominee is Apparent

Statement of Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook

On Tuesday, seven of the 10 presidential candidates – including Gov. Howard Dean – signed a Pledge circulated by campaign finance reform groups that committed them to save and strengthen the presidential public financing system and reduce the role of special interest money in presidential campaigns. Now, Dean says he plans to ask his supporters to vote on whether he should opt out of the public financing system for the primaries. The reason: If Dean becomes the Democratic nominee, the $45 million public funding spending ceiling would put him at a severe disadvantage against President Bush, who has opted out of public funding for the primaries to raise as much as $200 million.

While we wish that all the presidential candidates would stay within the public financing system and run for president on a level playing field, Bush’s excessive campaign spending – which could amount to four times the spending ceiling for any candidate who stays within the public financing system – places an extreme handicap on all other candidates who want to participate in a fair fight.

The huge sums that Bush will raise – mostly from wealthy, special interest donors – for the primaries will not be for seeking the Republican nomination, since Bush has no opposition. The money will be used to blast the presumptive Democratic nominee before the general election even begins.

Dean is giving his supporters two choices: "(a) to fund our campaign ourselves and decline matching funds,"…or "(b) accept federal matching funds and the spending limits." We believe Dean, and any other candidate who opts out, has a third choice.

A candidate could decide to opt out and still abide by the $45 million spending limit for the Democratic primaries – until a presumptive nominee exists (which could be as early as March). If that presumptive nominee is Dean, he could be more competitive with Bush – raising and spending additional money to compete with Bush’s expected $200 million. But until that time, adhering to the overall primary spending limit would ensure a relatively equal playing field among the Democrats.

The action of Bush and the probable action of Dean point out what the real discussion should be about: A major overhaul of the presidential public financing system is needed to eliminate special interest funding of presidential campaigns, restore integrity to the Oval Office and create a fair playing field for qualified candidates.


For more, please go to www.WhiteHouseForSale.org.

Copyright © 2015 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.