Bookmark and Share



» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights

Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment


Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

Roach v. T.L. Cannon Corp.

Topic(s): Class Actions
Workers' Rights


Related Press Releases:


Plaintiffs are employees at Applebee’s restaurants who were not paid wages to which they were entitled under state and federal law. In 2010, Plaintiffs sued the company that owned and operated the restaurants for their wages and sought to proceed in a class action. Even though the plaintiffs presented evidence that defendants’ uniform policies and practices – such as a policy of docking employees for rest breaks they had not taken – led to the wage law violations, the district court denied class certification in March 2013, ruling that after the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Comcast v. Behrend, a class action cannot be maintained whenever monetary relief must be calculated on an individual basis for each member of the class. On behalf of the plaintiffs, Public Citizen filed a petition for permission to appeal to the Second Circuit in New York in April 2013. Our petition argued that the district court’s rule, if accepted, would dramatically reduce the availability of class actions, because there are many types of cases (such as wage-and-hour cases) in which each member of the plaintiff class is entitled to a different amount of damages. The district court’s decision reads the Comcast decision too broadly, the petition argued, and conflicts with the widespread and long-standing view of the courts of appeals that a class action for damages may sometimes be maintained based on a common theory of liability notwithstanding the need for individualized damages calculations.

The court heard argument in September 2014. On February 10, 2015, the Court vacated the denial of class certification and remanded. The Court agreed with us that the district court had read Comcast too broadly and that the Supreme Court had not imposed a categorical bar to class certification where damages must be calculated on an individual basis. Instead, the district court on remand should reconsider certification, applying the Second Circuit’s longstanding approach – undisturbed by Comcast – that the individuation of damages is just one factor to be considered in the certification inquiry and that class certification may be appropriate even where damages are individualized.

Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.