Bookmark and Share

 

LITIGATION

» Access to Courts and Court Remedies

» Campaign Finance and Election Laws

» Constitutional Rights and Requirements

» Health, Safety, and Environment

» Open Government and Open Courts

» Representing Consumers

» Workers' Rights


Currently Featured Topics

Government Transparency
Consumer Justice
First Amendment
Health, Safety and the Environment

SUPREME COURT
ASSISTANCE PROJECT

Read about our work helping lawyers
with cases in the Supreme Court.

 


  Public Citizen | Litigation Cases ***Search other cases***

City of New York v. Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade

Topic(s): Auto and Truck Safety and Related Issues
Hazardous Substances and Environmental Protection
Preemption of Consumer Remedies
Docket: 10-618

Documents:

Description:

In this case, Public Citizen filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the City of New York's petition for certiorari, which asks the Court to overturn a lower court's decision preventing the City from enforcing rules that provide incentives for taxicab companies to purchase hybrid vehicles for their cab fleets.

The City has long regulated lease rates that cab companies charge cabdrivers. Because the drivers bear fuel costs, the City determined that in order to encourage cab fleets to buy fuel-efficient cars, it needed to allow higher lease rates for hybrid vehicles and lower ones for conventional, less fuel-efficient automobiles. The cab industry challenged the new lease rules, arguing that they were preempted by a federal law, the Energy Policy and Conservation Act, or EPCA, which gives the federal government the power to promulgate mandatory fuel efficiency standards for automakers and preempts state and local laws that relate to fuel efficiency standards. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit accepted the cab industry's arguments, and the City petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn that decision.

Copyright © 2010 Public Citizen. All rights reserved. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation.  Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.