GLOBALIZATION & TRADE ISSUES

» Corporate Power

» Jobs, Wages and Economic Outcomes

» Food Safety

» Access to Affordable Medicines

» Corporate-rigged “Trade” Pacts

» Alternatives to Corporate Globalization

» Other Issues

Trade Data Center

One-stop shop for searchable trade databases, case lists & more

Eyes on Trade

Global Trade Watch blog on trade & globalization. Subscribe to RSS.

Debunking Trade Myths

To hide the facts about failed trade policies, proponents are changing the data

Connect with GTW

What's New – Global Trade Watch

  • January 3: Choice of Robert Lighthizer as USTR Strengthens Prospects for a New Approach to U.S. Trade Policy.

View 'What's New' Archives

Global Trade Watch Home 

Corporate-Rigged Trade Deals: More Job Offshoring, More Income Inequality

Negotiated in secret with hundreds of industry advisors, corporate-driven trade deals such as the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the derailed Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), include special protections for businesses that offshore American jobs to low-wage countries and eliminate many of the usual risks that make firms think twice about moving to low-wage countries.

The offshoring incentives have contributed to the net loss of more than 57,000 American manufacturing facilities and nearly 5 million U.S. manufacturing jobs – one out of every four – in the era of corporate-rigged deals. The U.S. Department of Labor lists millions of workers as specifically losing their jobs to offshoring and import competition in this era – and that is under just one narrow program that excludes many whose job loss is trade-related. Studies estimate that the U.S. economy could have supported 7 million more manufacturing jobs if not for the massive trade deficits that have accrued under current U.S. trade policy.

This failed model has also exacerbated U.S. income inequality. A litany of studies has produced an academic consensus that trade flows since NAFTA and other deals have contributed to the historic increase in U.S. income inequality – the only debate is the degree to which trade is to blame. Failed trade deals have exacerbated inequality by displacing well-paid manufacturing workers who must then compete for lower-paid non-offshoreable service sector jobs, which in turn depresses wages in those sectors, spurring broad-based middle-class wage stagnation.

The TPP — which was defeated by thousands of diverse organizations representing working people united across borders — was a controversial potential trade deal that would have expanded job offshoring and worsened income inequality. The TPP would have replicated and even expanded on past deals' extraordinary privileges for firms that relocate abroad. The TPP's offshoring incentives included a guaranteed minimum standard of treatment in the offshore venue and compensation for regulatory costs. One study found that even with a conservative estimate of trade's contribution to inequality, the losses from a projected TPP-produced increase in inequality would have wiped out tiny projected gains from the deal for most U.S. workers. The net result would have been wage losses for all but the richest 10 percent of the United States. That is, for anyone making less than $88,000 per year, the TPP would have meant a pay cut.


Featured Resources:



Reports and Memos  |  Press Room  |  Congress Speaks Out  |  Civil Society Speaks Out


Public Citizen Factsheets, Reports & Memos




Public Citizen Press Releases & Statements




Members of Congress Speak Out




Civil Society Organizations Speak Out


Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

You can support the fight for greater government and corporate accountability through a donation to either Public Citizen, Inc., or Public Citizen Foundation, Inc.

Public Citizen lobbies Congress and federal agencies to advance Public Citizen’s mission of advancing government and corporate accountability. When you make a contribution to Public Citizen, you become a member of Public Citizen, showing your support and entitling you to benefits such as Public Citizen News. Contributions to Public Citizen are not tax-deductible.

Public Citizen Foundation focuses on research, public education, and litigation in support of our mission. By law, the Foundation can engage in only very limited lobbying. Contributions to Public Citizen Foundation are tax-deductible.