April 3, 2012
Public Citizen to Irving Schools: Advertising on School Sites Is the Wrong Way to Raise Revenue
Letter Describes Advertising’s Harmful Effects on Developing Children
WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Irving Independent School District, located in Irving, Texas, should not move forward with plans to sell advertising on school sites and naming rights to school assets, Public Citizen’s Commercial Alert said in a letter sent today to the Board of Trustees of Irving schools.
Pursuing this path would raise little revenue and would undermine Irving Independent School District’s educational and child development mission, Public Citizen said. The advertisements would bring only minuscule financial benefits. Moreover, a private company, Education Funding Partners, would act as a middleman between the district and advertisers, taking more than 20 percent of ad revenues.
School officials anticipate generating between $500,000 and $1 million per year in advertising revenue, amounting to only 0.2 to 0.4 percent of Irving’s annual budget. However, even this relatively trivial amount of revenue is likely an overestimation, given how much revenue comparable school districts have been able to amass from similar programs. Public Citizen’s report – “School Commercialism: High Costs, Low Revenues,” released in February – shows that in some of the largest districts in the country, school advertising schemes generate less than 0.05 percent of the districts’ annual budgets.
“Children already are surrounded by near-constant advertising that promotes consumerism and commercial values,” said Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen. “But the ubiquity of advertising is not a reason for allowing corporate naming rights and in-school advertising to persist; it is a reason children need a sanctuary from a world where everything seems to be for sale.”
Added Elizabeth Ben-Ishai, campaign coordinator for Public Citizen’s Commercial Alert project, “Advertising in schools conveys market, rather than civic, values and impedes the ability of the education system to function as an open space where ideas are freely exchanged and the next generation of public-minded, conscientious students can grow.”
School districts across the country that have adopted in-school advertising schemes have allowed advertisers to market products that are unhealthful and inappropriate for children. Even those schools that adopt guidelines to limit the types of advertising they accept – like Irving’s plan to prohibit advertising of cigarettes or alcohol – often allow for products that undermine student health and well-being to be advertised.
Weighed against the harms of school commercialism, the financial benefits of on-site advertising are minuscule, Public Citizen maintains. Given the relatively insignificant revenues that school advertising is likely to bring to the district’s schools, the risks are not worth it for Irving schools.
Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.citizen.org.