Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


June 27, 2012 

Barclays Penalty Demonstrates Need for Stronger Reforms, Full Funding for Wall Street Police

Barclays’ Fine Was Double the Budget Allocated for Industry’s Police

Washington, D.C.– The $450 million in penalties imposed today by United States and United Kingdom officials on UK’s Barclays Bank for market manipulation highlights the ongoing need for implementation of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act to protect the public and hold financial institutions accountable, Public Citizen said today.

“The occurrence of sweeping frauds committed daily by numerous traders and supervisors at Barclays reinforces the need for implementing strong reforms and equipping Wall Street police with needed resources,” said Tyson Slocum, director of Public Citizen’s Energy Program.

The Dodd-Frank Act established important new reforms, such as limiting the size of the market any one trader can control; moving more trading activity into formats directly regulated by federal officials; limiting the role speculators play in driving prices; and implementing the Volcker Rule, which prohibits casino-style banking.

Wall Street sympathizers in Washington, D.C., should be chilled by details of this case, Slocum said. The fact that violations were often committed daily at Barclays shows the need for expedited implementation of strong rules, he said.

“Barclays’ manipulation of a key interest rate index demonstrates the tissue-thin protection of world financial markets that led to the financial crash of 2008,” said Bartlett Naylor, Public Citizen’s financial policy advocate. “Investigations since the Barclays scheme have revealed corruptions far more profound. Credit rating agencies produced fallacious ratings, and banks falsified mortgage applications and disguised toxic assets from regulators.”

“Barclays’ manipulations affected the rates consumers paid for mortgages, car and student loans,” added Slocum. “Even today, evidence shows that financial speculators – and not supply/demand fundamentals – drive oil and gasoline prices.Wall Street sympathizers in Congress aiming to gut the Commodity Futures Trading Commission’s budget must understand that consumers will suffer if Congress removes these market police from the beat. For context, the $450 million fine is double the budget approved by the Republican-led U.S. House of Representatives for the CFTC, the lead U.S. investigator in the Barclays case.”

Also of concern is the level of penalties that Barclays faces.

“Executives at Barclays rightly volunteered to forego bonuses,” said Naylor. “But evidence in this case demonstrates fraud by individuals. As one trader confessed in an email, ‘I’m guilty as hell.’ We should not rely on voluntary pay cuts and penalties that may punish shareholders rather than those guilty of the crimes.”

“Unfortunately, the Justice Department chose to resolve the serious case with a non-prosecution agreement, continuing a disturbing trend of not holding corporate wrongdoers accountable through criminal prosecution or plea agreements,” said Public Citizen President Robert Weissman.


Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.citizen.org.

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.