<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>Public Citizen</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.citizen.org</provider_url><author_name>Diane Krauthamer</author_name><author_url>https://www.citizen.org/author/dkrauthamer/</author_url><title>Comments Opposing Addition of Steps in Proceedings to Regulate Occupational Hazards - Public Citizen</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="aWqDoBYFX0"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.citizen.org/article/comments-opposing-addition-of-steps-in-proceedings-to-regulate-occupational-hazards/"&gt;Comments Opposing Addition of Steps in Proceedings to Regulate Occupational Hazards&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.citizen.org/article/comments-opposing-addition-of-steps-in-proceedings-to-regulate-occupational-hazards/embed/#?secret=aWqDoBYFX0" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;Comments Opposing Addition of Steps in Proceedings to Regulate Occupational Hazards&#x201D; &#x2014; Public Citizen" data-secret="aWqDoBYFX0" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>These comments to the Department of Labor oppose the addition of a requirement for an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) to the already cumbersome process for creating regulations for occupational health and safety, as it would only lengthen (but not improve) the process by which regulations are made.</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.citizen.org/wp-content/uploads/public_citizen_shared_link.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>1200</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>628</thumbnail_height></oembed>
