Easterling v. Connecticut Department of Correction
- Order Granting Summary Judgment (05/05/2011)
- Opposition to Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (11/24/2010)
- Reply on Motion for Summary Judgment (11/24/2010)
- Motion for Summary Judgment (10/15/2010)
- Order Granting Class Certification (01/04/2010)
- Motion for Class Certification (07/29/2009)
- Order Denying Motion to Dismiss (02/09/2009)
- Opposition to Motion to Dismiss (09/29/2008)
- Complaint (05/30/2008)
We were co-counsel in this class action under Title VII that challenged the use of a physical fitness test that had a disparate impact on female applicants for entry-level Correction Officer positions. Connecticut used a 1.5-mile run test as a pass/fail screening device with norm-referenced cut scores that disproportionately eliminated female candidates. We alleged that, because Connecticut cannot demonstrate that the cut scores it used are job related and consistent with business necessity, its manner of use of the test violates Title VII. In early 2010, the court certified the class. On May 5, 2011, the court granted our motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
The relief stage resulted in a settlement providing back pay of over $1.8 million and priority hiring with retroactive seniority and pension credit for up to 28 class members.