HEALTH AND SAFETY

» Drug, Devices, and Supplements

» Physician Accountability

» Consumer Product Safety

» Worker Safety

» Health Care Delivery

» Auto and Truck Safety

» Global Access to Medicines

» Infant Formula Marketing

 

Statement on Selection of Dr. Maves as the President of AMA

Novenber 19, 2001

Statement by Sidney M. Wolfe, M.D.
Director, Public Citizen’s Health Research Group

The American Medical Association (AMA) has added another chapter to the seemingly endless succession of extremely poor, dangerous choices for executive vice president of the organization. The announcement today that the new AMA chief executive, Dr. Michael Maves, is the former president of CHPA (Consumer Healthcare Products Association), the trade association representing the herbal, dietary supplement and over-the-counter drug (OTC) industries (presumably with the approval of the AMA’s Board of Trustees), threatens to bring this troubled and dying organization from the early part of the 21st century back to the 19th century. In that earlier era, before medicines had to be proven safe and effective before being sold, patent medicines, some of which were referred to as snake oils, ruled the roost.

Even in the realm of over-the-counter drugs, CHPA funded and signed off on the design of a Yale study on the decongestant and weight reduction drug, PPA (phenylpropanolamine). But when the study showed a significant increase in hemorrhagic strokes in people using products containing the drug, CHPA — under the leadership of Dr. Maves — denounced the study. In the 1980s, the predecessor to CHPA, the Non-Prescription Drug Manufacturers Association, was instrumental in delaying the addition of warning labels on aspirin concerning the increased risk of Reye’s Syndrome in children with flu or chicken pox who took aspirin.  As a result of the delay, hundreds more children died or sustained brain damage.

I would urge all physicians who still cling to their AMA membership — despite its embrace of the Sunbeam scandal (an uncritical proposed endorsement of medical products under the leadership of Dr. John Seward), the real estate scandal (under the leadership of Dr. James Sammons) and the recent predictably poor leadership of Dr. Ratcliffe Anderson — to resign from this dying organization, which once represented more than two-thirds of American doctors but soon will represent less than one-third. The hundreds of dollars of patients’ money, which goes to pay for the annual dues, could be better spent. Subscriptions to excellent medical journals such as the Journal of the American Medical Association are available to non-members as well as members.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.