Bookmark and Share

 



Eyes on Trade

Public Citizen's Global Trade Watch blog on globalization and trade

 

What's New - Global Trade Watch


View 'What's New' Archives


Public Citizen | Peru, Panama & Colombia FTAs - Peru, Panama & Colombia FTAs: NAFTA Expansion to the Rainforest and Beyond

Peru, Panama & Colombia FTAs: NAFTA Expansion to the Rainforest and Beyond

Latest News on the Bush Hangover FTAs

Haga "click" aquí para leer sobre tratados de libre comercio entre los EEUU y la Región Andina en español.

For the latest updates on the Peru, Panama and Colombia FTAs, please see the relevant section of our blog, Eyes on Trade.

Democratic leaders in Congress and the executive branch have a choice to make. NAFTA-style "free trade" agreements (FTAs) with Panama and Colombia, left over from the Bush administration, remain pending, with corporate backers and "free trade" cheerleaders urging for their passage. On the campaign trail, President Obama expressed his opposition (PDF) to some of the most harmful and anti-democratic aspects of our current trade policy, and pledged to renegotiate NAFTA. We need to do the work to ensure that he keeps these campaign promises.

Obama's U.S. Trade Representative, Ron Kirk, has made disappointing statements about wanting to bring the Panama FTA to Congress — making it clear that work cannot stop in the fight to bury the failed NAFTA model once and for all. Panama is infamous as a corporate tax haven, and has some of the most secretive, least transparent banking and financial laws in the world. In the midst of our current global financial crisis, extending an FTA to Panama would send exactly the wrong message — in addition to all the rest of the damaging NAFTA-style provisions contained in the Panama FTA.

The Colombia FTA remains controversial, thanks to the repressive regime of Colombia President Álvaro Uribe. Colombia has a terrible record of human and labor rights violations, and is one of the leading countries in the world in terms of internally displaced peoples, particularly with regards to its indigenous and Afro-descendant populations.

As for the Peru FTA, this agreement was passed in late 2007 after an unfortunate May 2007 deal was struck between a handful of House Democrats and the Bush administration. This deal made needed improvements to the labor and environmental provisions, but unfortunately left in almost all the bad NAFTA-style provisions that fair trade groups demanded be taken out. Thus, the deal only put a new roof on a condemned building. The Peru FTA passed only after a majority of House Democrats voted against it - the first time in literally decades that over half of a majority party voted against its leadership.

Learn more about the many problems plaguing the Peru, Panama and Colombia pacts by visiting the issue-areas listed in depth.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.