Unnecessary Cesarean Sections: Curing A National Epidemic
-Unnecessary Cesarean Sections: Curing A National Epidemic
-How to Help Yourself or Your Friends/Family to Avoid an Unnecessary C-section
The United States cesarean section rate, which skyrocketed during the 1980s, has
plateaued and begun a very slow reversal of this earlier dangerous trend. It appears that
increased use of vaginal birth after cesarean section (VBAC) has been a major factor in
bringing the increase in c-section rates to an end. This is the main conclusion of a
report by Public Citizen's Health Research Group on the use of cesarean section in U.S.
hospitals, findings of which are summarized here. According to the National Center for
Health Statistics (NCHS), the c-section rate nationwide increased more than four-fold in a
little less than 20 years, rising from 5.5 percent in 1970 to 24.7 percent in 1988. Since
then the rate has varied only slightly, actually decreasing modestly after 1990.
Meanwhile, between 1985 and 1992, the VBAC rate (the proportion of women with a previous
c-section who deliver vaginally) has steadily risen from 6.6 to 25.4 percent. Our own
data, collected mainly from state vital records offices, show a nationwide cesarean rate
of 22.6 percent for 1992, slightly lower than the 1990 rate of 22.7 percent presented in
our previous c-section report. Because of the large number of births used to calculate
these cesarean rates, even this small decline was statistically significant. The challenge
now is to encourage a much sharper reversal of the earlier trend and work toward a less
extensive, more rational use of cesarean surgery.
The upward cesarean surgery trend has been of concern to the Health Research Group for
several years. In 1988, we published our first report on this issue, for the first time
making data on hospital and physician cesarean rates widely available. Since then, we have
continued to expand the size of our state and hospital databases. The current report
includes statewide c-section rates from all 50 states and the District of Columbia,
statewide VBAC rates from 49 states (only Connecticut is missing) and the District of
Columbia, and hospital-specific cesarean rates and VBAC rates from 3,159 hospitals in 41
states. These statistics are calculated from data on the method of delivery used in almost
4 million births occurring in U.S. hospitals in 1992, making our report the most
comprehensive source of information on hospital and state cesarean section and VBAC rates
available.
Delivery by Cesarean Section
Over most of the past 25 years, the average American woman expecting a child has been
increasingly unlikely to deliver her baby vaginally. Nearly one in four pregnant women now
have a cesarean section. This operation is similar in scope to an appendix or gall bladder
removal in that it involves entering the abdominal cavity and surgically modifying an
organ.
For years controversy raged in the United States over whether increased c-section use
represented a gross and excessive danger to mothers, a new and more convenient way of
delivering normal babies, the guarantee of a perfect baby, the root of the decline in
infant deaths, or a knee-jerk response by physicians to problems of malpractice, or a
source of added income for doctors and hospitals. At one point, an academic article went
so far as to suggest that all women be offered a cesarean at their due date. The
answers to most of these questions have become increasingly clear as research accumulates.
C-section, while at times a life-saving intervention for both mother and child, can do
significant harm to mothers without providing additional benefits to infants when
performed outside of certain well-defined medical situations. We are beginning the long
road back from an epidemic of unnecessary surgery.
Curing the Cesarean Epidemic
There are many strategies that hospitals, insurers and consumers can pursue in lowering
cesarean section rates. Hospitals can address the problem by putting one or more of
the following measures in place:
 Develop and enforce clinical standards for
obstetric care;
Require second opinions for all but emergency
cesareans;
Audit and peer-review cesarean operations;
Develop mandatory, hospital-wide information
forms which explain to women with previous cesarean sections why VBAC is recommended as
the safest course for most women;
Use trained labor companions;
Incorporate midwives and their philosophy of
care into labor and delivery care programs; and
Develop a perinatal database to track patient
care and clinical outcomes.
Financial incentives driving our current insurance system favor cesarean surgery over
vaginal delivery. There are six actions we feel insurance companies should take to
correct this situation:
- Equalize physician fees for c-section and vaginal delivery;
- Pay hospitals through a refined "diagnostic related group" (DRG) compensation
system that more closely reflects true cost differences among various types of deliveries;
- Use such cost control tools as preadmission certification of elective repeat cesareans
and retrospective review;
- Select physicians and hospitals with low cesarean section rates as preferred providers;
- Provide financial incentives for women to attempt VBAC; and
- Use insurance coverage to promote less costly and less technology-driven forms of care.
The most important people to stop this epidemic are those who must undergo and live
with the effects of unnecessary cesarean surgery -- women. We suggest three steps
women can take to lower the risk of unnecessary cesarean surgery:
 Determine the cesarean section
"track record" of available doctors and hospitals;
Discuss concerns about cesarean section
and other forms of medical intervention during labor and delivery with their doctor;
Consider choosing a midwife for prenatal
care and as the birth attendant.
In these ways, hospitals, insurers, and consumers can all take action to lower the
incidence of expensive and dangerous unnecessary cesarean sections being performed today.
This is truly an issue where the interests of good health and cost-containment coincide,
creating common ground between health-care consumers and the insurers and employers who
pay for this care. With regard to cesarean section, physicians have adopted a style of
practice that is in the best interest of neither society nor the individual woman. By
taking actions described above, those with a stake in this issue can be instrumental in
reversing the 20-year trend that has caused "the c-section epidemic."
Unnecessary Cesarean Sections: Curing A National Epidemic
Published: May 1994
Cost: $15 state report or $60 for the national report
To order this book, you can send a check payable to Public Citizen
to our Publications office at 1600 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20009. Please be sure
to include $3.50 shipping and handling. If you wish to pay by credit card
(Visa/Mastercard/American Express/ Discover), please call (202) 588-1000 and ask for our
Publications office.
more resources
Because Public Citizen does not accept funds from corporations, professional associations or government agencies,
we can remain independent and follow the truth wherever it may lead. But that means we
depend on the generosity of concerned citizens like you for the resources to fight on
behalf of the public interest. If you would like to help us in our fight,
click here.
|
