Bookmark and Share


Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
(202) 588-7741, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
(202) 588-7716

Dorry Samuels, Press Office Coordinator
(202) 588-7742, Twitter

Other Important links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Citizen Energy blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter

Twitter Updates

    Public Citizen | Publications - The Arbitration Trap: How Credit Card Companies Ensnare Consumers


    The Arbitration Trap: How Credit Card Companies Ensnare Consumers


    The Arbitration Trap: How Credit Card Companies Ensnare Consumers

    This report details how arbitration firms and credit card companies enjoy a cozy, mutually beneficial relationship at the expense of consumers they force into binding mandatory arbitration. Using data from California, the findings provide a glimpse of how arbitration traps consumers throughout the country in unfair, secret proceedings where for-profit arbitrators make the rules. Public Citizen's research uncovered consumers who spent years fending off collection agencies, cleaning up identity theft messes and struggling to bounce back from credit rating hits.

    • Read the report [pdf]
    • Read the press release 
    • Read our news coverage
    • Read the testimony of Laura MacCleery [pdf] before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law regarding the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007
    • Read Public Citizen's rebuttal to industry's misleading statements about the report.
    • Read our fact sheet on the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007
    • Read a letter of support of the Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007 signed by 32 groups
    • Learn ways to protect yourself
    • Read the blog
    • Read the statement of Joan Claybrook, Public Citizen President
    • Read the statement of Laura MacCleery, Director of Public Citizen's Congress Watch
    • Read the statement of Troy Cornock, victim of binding mandatory arbitration
    • Read the statement of Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), sponsor of Arbitration Fairness Act of 2007.
    • Read our bibliography of law review articles critiquing binding mandatory arbitration
    • Examples of BMA clauses from MBNA (April 2006) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. (2005)
    • NAF California data Jan. 2003 to Mar. 2007* [Excel file]

      *This spreadsheet consists of the information on 33,948 National Arbitration Forum cases conducted in California between Jan. 1, 2003 and Mar. 31, 2007. It was compiled from quarterly reports that the National Arbitration Forum posted in a difficult-to-find place on its Web site in Adobe Systems’ Portable Document Format (PDF). Public Citizen converted them to an Excel spreadsheet so California residents and others interested in binding mandatory arbitration may do their own analysis of NAF arbitrations in California and of the records of NAF arbitrators.
      The PDF reports can be found here. To reach the reports from the NAF home page, click on the Focus Areas link across the top of the page beneath the NAF logo, and then click on “Consumer” on the drop down menu. On the consumer page, go to the “Resources” menu on the right side of the page and click on "California CCP 1281.96 Report."

    Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

    Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


    Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

    Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

    You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


    To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
    To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.