Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Luis Castilla, Press Officer, Public Citizen’s Texas office
w. (512) 637-9467

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Jan. 21, 2016

Obama Is Missing Opportunity Today by Not Issuing Executive Order on Secret Election Spending

Six Years After Citizens United, Obama Still Talking About the Need to Curb Money in Politics

WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Barack Obama is missing an opportunity by not issuing an executive order today, as Americans look to him for leadership – exactly six years after the U.S. Supreme Court’s damaging Citizens United ruling – to curb secret election spending, Public Citizen said.

Although the White House is reportedly considering issuing such an order, administration officials have indicated that it won’t happen today.

“The president has talked eloquently about the need to curb money in politics, but he has yet to act,” said Lisa Gilbert, director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “It is disappointing that the president is not taking advantage of this day to take the one action he can take without Congress and issue this executive order. That said, we are hopeful that we will see this action very soon.”

Public Citizen has been at the forefront of the push for an executive order to require contractors to disclose political spending. In April, a coalition of groups rallied outside the White House and presented more than 500,000 petition signatures. In November, the coalition delivered more than 851,000 signatures to Obama. And in December, Public Citizen and other groups delivered a million signatures to the White House calling on the president to issue an order.

Less than a third (PDF) of the 15 largest publicly traded federal contractors fully disclose the details of their contributions to nonprofit groups and trade associations – contributions that could be used for electioneering expenditures. The proposed executive order would ensure that at least 70 percent of the Fortune 100 companies disclose their political spending.

Since Citizens United, election spending has skyrocketed, with the expectation that $10 billion will be spent on the 2016 elections. Voters also have seen a torrent of secret election spending, with money funneled through trade associations and so-called “social welfare groups” – organizations masquerading as nonprofits but whose sole purpose is to buy election ads.

“Billionaires and Big Business are tightening their grip on our elections,” said Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen. “Americans realize that to address our greatest challenges – from inequality to climate change, from providing health care for all to ensuring everyone is paid a living wage – we must fix the broken political process. President Obama can help preserve his own policy legacy and pave the way for more critical change by issuing the executive order.” Polls show that Americans are fed up. But they are doing something about it:

  • More than 5 million signatures have been gathered in support of a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United;
  • Sixteen states, the District of Columbia and nearly 700 local governments have called for an amendment;
  • A majority of the U.S. Senate voted in favor of an amendment in 2014; and
  • A record 1.2 million signatures have been submitted to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission calling for the agency to require publicly held corporations to disclose political spending.


Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


You can support the fight for greater government and corporate accountability through a donation to either Public Citizen, Inc., or Public Citizen Foundation, Inc.

Public Citizen lobbies Congress and federal agencies to advance Public Citizen’s mission of advancing government and corporate accountability. When you make a contribution to Public Citizen, you become a member of Public Citizen, showing your support and entitling you to benefits such as Public Citizen News. Contributions to Public Citizen are not tax-deductible.

Public Citizen Foundation focuses on research, public education, and litigation in support of our mission. By law, the Foundation can engage in only very limited lobbying. Contributions to Public Citizen Foundation are tax-deductible.