Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Luis Castilla, Press Officer, Public Citizen’s Texas office
w. (512) 637-9467

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Oct. 17, 2014

Alabama Supreme Court Lifts Gag Order on Customers and Attorneys in Exterminator Case

A Victory for Free Speech

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, in response to a Public Citizen petition, the Alabama Supreme Court lifted a gag order that prevented more than 100 plaintiffs and their attorneys from explaining why consumers should be cautious about employing an exterminating company.

The decision represents a victory for the free speech rights of consumers, ensuring that they will have access to the best information in deciding what companies should get their hard-earned money.

The unusual gag order, issued Jan. 7, restricted attorney Thomas F. Campbell, anyone from his firm – Campbell Law PC – and any of the more than 100 customers whom the firm is representing in a suit against A-1 Exterminating from speaking publicly or privately about the company. On behalf of unhappy customers, Campbell is suing A-1 Exterminating for promising, but not providing, effective termite treatment.

Public Citizen filed a petition on Feb. 19 to the state Supreme Court asking it to rescind the gag order because it was impermissible under the First Amendment. In addition, it violated the First Amendment because it was issued without giving Campbell an opportunity to be heard and without evidence of a need for such an injunction.

“The gag order was grossly overbroad,” said Paul Alan Levy, attorney at Public Citizen. “We are pleased the court recognized that the order violated the First Amendment and reversed the decision.”

The court made clear that the exterminating company may ask for a narrower order, but that it will have to prove its vague claims that the attorneys made false statements about it, and that any restrictions on particular statements are needed to protect its right to a fair trial and reach no further than needed to protect that right. The court said, the “law demands a nuanced approach [that protects] the rights of parties to freely air their views and opinions in the ‘market square’ now taking the form of the electronic square known as the Internet.”

Find more information about the case.


Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


You can support the fight for greater government and corporate accountability through a donation to either Public Citizen, Inc., or Public Citizen Foundation, Inc.

Public Citizen lobbies Congress and federal agencies to advance Public Citizen’s mission of advancing government and corporate accountability. When you make a contribution to Public Citizen, you become a member of Public Citizen, showing your support and entitling you to benefits such as Public Citizen News. Contributions to Public Citizen are not tax-deductible.

Public Citizen Foundation focuses on research, public education, and litigation in support of our mission. By law, the Foundation can engage in only very limited lobbying. Contributions to Public Citizen Foundation are tax-deductible.