Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


May 22, 2014

U.S. Chamber Opposition to CEO-Median Employee Pay Disclosure Reveals How Much Big Businesses Have to Hide

Chamber Report Overblows Costs of Compliance, Revealingly Complains Dodd-Frank Disclosure Would Cause ‘Shame’

Note: Today, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce released a report titled, “The Egregious Costs of the SEC’s Pay-Ratio Disclosure Regulation.” The calculation in question is part of a section of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act that requires publicly traded companies to disclose the CEO’s pay as a multiple of the median-paid employee at the firm. The report includes a survey by four trade associations that claim it would take 952 hours to calculate the median of company pay for the average firm. Below are comments from two Public Citizen experts.

Bartlett Naylor, financial policy advocate at Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division:

“The Chamber is simply recycling the same tired tropes about the high cost of compliance it has used to fight this simple rule since Congress approved it in 2010. It is simply not credible that the typical firm would need to spend more than a few hours estimating the median of company pay.

“The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions’ proposed rule permits statistical sampling, which allows the company to perform minimal analysis on the vast majority of employees who are paid either in the top or bottom half. The Chamber’s own data reveal that some companies can complete the calculation for $10,000, which is already an exaggeration. A well-managed company should already know how much its employees make.

“The Chamber’s corporate members fear a marketplace where investors can use the mandated contextualized CEO pay figure. After analyzing other factors at the firm, the prudent investor will choose a company with a low CEO-to-median-pay ratio. That’s because such a CEO represents a better value than a firm with a high ratio. Additionally, there’s more room on the upside to increase pay if the CEO performs well.”

Sam Jewler, communications officer at U.S. Chamber Watch, a project of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division:

“The Chamber’s report claims that the intent behind the pay ratio rule is to ‘shame’ companies, but greater transparency can bring shame only if the company has something to hide. As CEO compensation continues to rise, the income inequality gap widens further. Big companies are secretively backing the Chamber for fear that the public outcry could result in full disclosure of how much more money executives of big companies are making than their hard-working employees.”


Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.