Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


May 7, 2014

House Should Stop Partisan Bickering Over Lerner and Focus on Bright Line Rules Instead

Legislators Should Focus on Solutions: Changes to Vague Definition of Political Activity

WASHINGTON, D.C. – As the U.S. House of Representatives votes to hold former IRS official Lois Lerner in contempt this week, legislators should shift their focus to the IRS’ attempt to clarify the vague standards that led to the “scandal” of last year, Public Citizen said today.

The IRS proposed new rules in November that seek to resolve the ambiguity of standards governing political activity of nonprofits. Congressional lawmakers should focus their energy on improving the rules and moving them through the process, not partisan bickering, Public Citizen said.

“With clearer, objective rules, future applicants will have concrete standards in place when they apply for nonprofit status,” said Craig Holman, government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “It’s time for legislators to stop focusing on Lois Lerner and start focusing on solutions to the problem that allowed this to happen in the first place.”

Added Lisa Gilbert, director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division and manager of the organization’s Bright Lines Project, “Despite this ongoing and vicious criticism, the IRS and Department of Treasury have admirably remained focused on their goal – clarifying the standard for what constitutes political activity for nonprofits.”

Under the current rule, the use of subjective evaluation hinders the agency from enforcing the rules, and can encourage it to make bad decisions on how to make those evaluations. The IRS has said it will hold hearings on the proposed rule this summer and likely will revise the rule to respond to a record number of public comments.

“The IRS should be applauded for tackling these thorny issues, and for its willingness to be flexible and revise the proposal,” Gilbert said. “The rules should be easy to understand and hard to game.”

Even if the rulemaking were to end, the IRS would still need to write new guidelines for how to define nonprofit political activity to educate the agents who will make those fact-intensive decisions. That eventuality is exactly what those opposed to the rulemaking should fear: Instead of a rule produced with ample public input, the IRS would write a rule for itself without any public input at all.


Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.