Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


May 6, 2014

Advocates to Congress: Tax Wall Street Trades to Avoid Another Flash Crash

United States Falling Behind Europe in Efforts to Curb High-Frequency Trading

WASHINGTON, D.C. – On this day four years ago, the impact of high-frequency trading hit home as the stock market plummeted 1,000 points in a matter of minutes. The Dow Jones Industrial Average bottomed out after losing 9 percent of its value, causing around 20,000 trades to be cancelled by exchanges. The automated computer algorithms used by high-frequency traders have been found to be a large contributor to the escalation of the crash that day.

Financial reform advocates marked the Flash Crash anniversary by urging Congress to pass a financial transaction tax and to support the European Union (EU) nations as they today announced a move to implement a unified tax on trades. Though participating nations will continue to work out the nuances of the unified tax, it is scheduled to take effect before January 1, 2016, and in its first phase will focus on taxation of shares and some derivatives. The United States formerly taxed trades from 1914-1966.

“It took only a few minutes for high-speed trading computers to send the market into freefall. It’s outrageous that four years later, Congress has yet to fix the problem by reinstating a meaningful tax on Wall Street trades,” said Susan Harley, deputy director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “Even though taxes proposed are tiny, they stack up quickly, meaning that our country could bring in hundreds of billions of dollars in much-needed revenue. We can’t afford another Flash Crash, just like we can’t afford to let Wall Street continue to get away with not paying its fair share.”

“It's not too late to learn lessons from the Flash Crash,” said Sarah Anderson, global economy project director for Institute for Policy Studies. “Speed-demon high-frequency traders add no value to the real economy. Now is the time for the U.S. to follow Europe’s lead and place a petite tax on trades that would encourage longer-term productive investment.”

“Congressional proposals to tax Wall Street will take us a long way toward solving the problems that led to the Flash Crash of 2010,” said Marcus Stanley, policy director for Americans for Financial Reform. “What’s more, nonpartisan experts estimate that a tax of just 3 pennies per $100 of Wall Street trading would generate more than $352 billion in revenue over 10 years. At a time when crucial programs for middle class Americans are being cut back, we can't ignore this potential revenue source any longer.”

“The economic data are clear: A tax on Wall Street trades would save money for the average investor,” said Nicole Woo, director of domestic policy for Center for Economic and Policy Research. “It’s important that our market investors are focused on long-term, productive trades, not short term churning.”

Getting much hype from Michael Lewis’ book, “Flash Boys: A Wall Street Revolt,” high-speed trading is also being examined by the Department of Justice, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission regarding claims that it amounts to illegal front-running which provides an unfair advantage in the market.

For live updates, follow #FlashCrash and #WallStTax on Twitter.


Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.