Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Symone Sanders, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch division
w. (202) 454-5108
ssanders@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

*Corporate Reform Coalition Release*

May 6, 2014

Kraft Foods Faces Pressure to Keep Money Out of Politics

Glenview, Illinois – During its annual meeting of shareholders today, Kraft Foods Group, Inc. will face a resolution filed by the Green Century Equity Fund urging the company to refrain from using corporate funds to influence any political election campaign. Kraft Foods spent millions last year to oppose legislation for labeling food containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs), which shareholders argue exposed the company to significant brand and reputational risks without generating value for shareholders.

“Companies that spend millions to undermine key environmental and consumer protections put both our democracy and shareholder value at risk,” said Lucia von Reusner, shareholder advocate for Green Century Capital Management. “American consumers widely disapprove of corporate money in politics, and shareholders urge Kraft Foods to listen to its customers and keep money out of high-risk political gambles.”

Kraft Foods is one of the largest food and beverage companies in the world, and is recognized as among the top five contributors to opposing legislation that would have provided consumers with information about GMOs in their food. Labeling of GMOs is supported by more than 90 percent of U.S. consumers, and companies that spent millions to defeat labeling measures were the subject of significant media coverage and controversy surrounding these initiatives.

“It’s unfortunate that food companies such as Kraft continue to spend millions of dollars to defeat GMO labeling and leave consumers in the dark,” said Dev Gowda, advocate with Illinois Public Interest Research Group (PIRG). “Illinois PIRG fully supports Green Century’s resolution to get Kraft money out of politics.”

“The people of this country want and deserve a democracy in which politicians are elected on the basis of where they stand on issues and how they will serve their constituency,” said Brian Gladstein, director of Programs and Strategy at Common Cause Illinois. “Yet, corporations such as Kraft threaten that fundamental belief by buying votes, influencing politicians and creating legislation through large sums of corporate donations that better serve their profit margin off the back of hard-working Americans. The time has come to organize and take back our democracy through shareholder resolutions such as this one.”

"Growing demand for GMO labeling proves that companies like Kraft, which spend millions to silence consumer demand, will succeed only in tarnishing their brand identity and alienating concerned shoppers,” said Jessica Fujan, Midwest organizerfor Food and Water Watch. “The food industry spent $40 million lobbying the federal government in 2011, and smart shareholders know this is bad for the food system and bad for democracy."

“Consumers have a right to know what is in their food, shareholders have a right to invest in companies they believe in and voters deserve elections free from corporate influence,” added Lisa Gilbert, director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “By meddling in elections, Kraft has come down squarely on the side of secrecy.”

The public overwhelming disapproves of corporate money in politics, with more than 80 percent of Americans across party lines agreeing that there is “too much money in politics” according to a 2012 Bannon Communications poll. The same poll reported that 79 percent of respondents would boycott a company to protest its political spending, and 65 percent would sell stock in the company.

In addition to being controversial, several academic studies suggest that corporate political contributions do not generate returns to shareholders. Among them is a 2012 study by Harvard Business School professor John C. Coates, which concludes that “in most industries, political activity correlates negatively with measures of shareholder power, positively with signs of agency costs, and negatively with shareholder value … Overall, the results are inconsistent with politics generally serving shareholder interests.”

Expressing concern about the reputational risks that political contributions expose companies to and citing the company’s controversial GMO contributions, Green Century filed a shareholder proposal urging Kraft Foods to refrain entirely from using corporate funds to influence any political election.

###

The Corporate Reform Coalition is made up of more than 75 organizations and individuals from good governance groups, environmental groups and organized labor, and includes elected officials and socially responsible investors. The coalition seeks to promote corporate governance solutions to combat undisclosed money in elections. For more information, please visit www.CorporateReformCoaliton.org.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.