Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Dec. 17, 2013  

Hearing Today Will Show That Consumers, Employees and Even Small Businesses Are Losing Right to Sue

Statement of Christine Hines, Consumer and Civil Justice Counsel, Public Citizen

Note: Today, U.S. Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, will hold a hearing titled “The Federal Arbitration Act and Access to Justice: Will Recent Supreme Court Decisions Undermine the Rights of Consumers, Workers, and Small Businesses?”

Will recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions undermine the rights of consumers, workers and small businesses? The answer is a resounding yes. In fact, the court’s rulings already have begun to have an impact. Thousands of consumer and employment disputes with corporations have and will be dismissed and disregarded because of language buried in the fine print of take-it-or-leave terms in everyday consumer and employment contracts. These provisions, called forced arbitration clauses, require consumers and employees to resolve their disputes in secret, costly arbitration proceedings instead of in court. (For a list of selected cases in which forced arbitration clauses and class-action bans were enforced as a result of recent Supreme Court rulings, visit http://www.citizen.org/documents/selected-cases-impacted-by-att-mobility-v-concepcion-and-american-express-v-italian-colors.pdf.)

Today’s hearing will highlight a handful of recent Supreme Court decisions, including AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion and American Express v. Italian Colors. These cases expanded corporations’ ability to deny consumers their legal remedies. Big businesses can use forced arbitration clauses to prohibit participation in class actions, even if class actions are the only economically viable way for consumers to pursue their cases.

The evidence has long been clear that forced arbitration is not a legitimate alternative method to resolve disputes, as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other business entities contend. Instead, forced arbitration squashes valid legal claims from ever going forward. As a result, companies are repeatedly let off the hook for egregious and illegal conduct, including discriminatory acts in the workplace, faulty home building, illegal charges and fees on cell phone bills, abusive treatment of the elderly in nursing homes and other misconduct.

In a recent release of preliminary data from its ongoing study on the use of forced arbitration in the financial services industry, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) found that very few consumers go to arbitration. Consumers prefer to have their day in court. The study also found that more than 90 percent of contracts with arbitration clauses prohibit consumers from participating in class actions. 

The Arbitration Fairness Act, introduced by U.S. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), would restore consumers’ and employees’ right to seek redress in court and band together in class actions in consumer, employment and antitrust disputes.

American families need a CFPB rule to completely restore their legal rights in their dealing with the financial services industry, and we need Sen. Franken’s legislation to stamp out the predatory practice in all other consumer sectors, including employment, home construction, cell phone and nursing home contracts.


Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


You can support the fight for greater government and corporate accountability through a donation to either Public Citizen, Inc., or Public Citizen Foundation, Inc.

Public Citizen lobbies Congress and federal agencies to advance Public Citizen’s mission of advancing government and corporate accountability. When you make a contribution to Public Citizen, you become a member of Public Citizen, showing your support and entitling you to benefits such as Public Citizen News. Contributions to Public Citizen are not tax-deductible.

Public Citizen Foundation focuses on research, public education, and litigation in support of our mission. By law, the Foundation can engage in only very limited lobbying. Contributions to Public Citizen Foundation are tax-deductible.