Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Symone Sanders, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch division
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Nov. 14, 2013

Approval of Tasimelteon Would Set Dangerous Precedent, Public Citizen Tells FDA Advisory Committee

Last-Minute, Highly Unorthodox Changes to Clinical Trial Protocol for New Sleep Medicine Threaten to Undermine Integrity of Approval Process for New Drugs

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The uncertainties generated by last-minute changes to the clinical trial protocol for the new sleep medicine tasimelteon raise serious questions about the drug’s effectiveness and, if it is approved, about the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) standards for approving new drugs, Public Citizen said today in testimony to the agency’s Peripheral and Central Nervous Systems Drugs Advisory Committee.

Approximately 10 percent of the blind cannot perceive light, which often causes their circadian rhythms, and thus their sleep patterns, to periodically deviate from a normal 24-hour day. Tasimelteon would be the first drug approved to treat the estimated 100,000 blind patients with this condition, known as non-24 hour disorder.

However, the development process for tasimelteon casts considerable doubt on whether the drug is truly effective for this disorder. In a highly unusual move, almost two years into the trial and after data on most subjects had already been collected, the manufacturer of the drug, Vanda Pharmaceuticals, Inc., proposed a complete switch of the trial’s original primary endpoint for assessing the drug’s effectiveness because it claimed that it could not recruit enough subjects into the study. By the end of the trial, the FDA and the company had not agreed upon the primary effectiveness endpoint or the statistical plan used to analyze the data.

Clinical trials are designed to test a pre-specified hypothesis. Changing the analytical plan midway through a trial raises the potential for false positive findings. That tasimelteon is a new drug being tested for a new indication further increases the chances that the drug might erroneously be deemed effective.

“The way in which the data on tasimelteon were generated and analyzed raises far more questions than answers,” said Dr. Sammy Almashat, researcher with Public Citizen’s Health Research Group. “Approval of this drug, given the magnitude of post-hoc changes so close to the end of the study, would set an ominous precedent for future new drug development programs.”

Read Public Citizen’s testimony here.


Copyright © 2015 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.