Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

July 9, 2013

Senate Energy Committee Should Press FERC Chair Nominee on Consumer Protection Plans

Advocacy Groups Write Letter to Committee Chairman Wyden Naming Four Demands for Incoming FERC Chair

WASHINGTON, D.C. – President Barack Obama’s nomination of former utility regulator and consumer advocate Ron Binz to chair the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is a welcome development. The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee should question Binz to ensure his support of several key consumer protection issues before confirming him, a group of consumer and labor advocacy groups wrote to Committee Chairman Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Ranking Member Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) today.

The groups wrote that they “urge a new FERC chairman who is committed above all to protecting consumers by ensuring that all electric rates are just and reasonable, and that markets are transparent and accountable to consumers.”

The letter lists four key reforms that Binz should support:

1. The new chair should create a consumer advocacy office at FERC, with a director appointed by the president, adequate funding, political independence and the ability to conduct investigations and intervene on behalf of consumers. The office should be able to provide funding to consumer groups to facilitate their participation in FERC proceedings.

2. The new FERC chair should increase transparency and accountability of private market monitors – known as regional transmission organizations – that have significant influence over energy rates but are more beholden to financial firms, power generators, utilities and retail service providers than to consumers.

3. FERC should undertake a comprehensive investigation of the “justness and reasonableness” of wholesale power supply prices in the centralized markets administered by regional transmission organizations. FERC rejected a widely supported proposal for this kind of investigation in 2007 under President George W. Bush.

4. The chair should review the way incentive rates are used to encourage transmission investment and ensure that the incentives are not increasing costs to consumers without improving system reliability.

Binz’s background suggests that he has an inclination to support consumer protections and not shy away from taking a stand on important issues.

The letter was signed by Consumers Union; National Consumer Law Center, on behalf of its low-income clients; Public Citizen; Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO; Citizens’ Utility Board of Oregon; Low Income Utility Advocacy Project of Illinois; Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy; Public Utility Law Project of New York, Inc.; Texas Legal Services Center; Texas Ratepayers’ Organization to Save Energy; TURN-The Utility Reform Network (California); and Virginia Citizens Consumer Council.

The letter is available here.

 

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.