Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Dan Hockensmith, Communications Officer (Global Trade Watch)
w. (202) 454-5108
dhockensmith@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

May 16, 2013

Win! Following Public Citizen Petition, Charles Schwab Drops Class-Action Ban in Investor Contracts

Statement of Christine Hines, Consumer and Civil Justice Counsel, Public Citizen, Congress Watch Division

Bowing to public pressure created by Public Citizen, Charles Schwab Corp. announced Tuesday that it would remove an insidious provision in its investor contracts that denied its customers the ability to band together in class actions against it. We are pleased with the firm’s decision. Schwab’s move comes three weeks after Public Citizen launched a campaign asking its members and supporters to sign a petition demanding that the brokerage firm remove the ban on class actions that’s hidden in the fine print of its contracts. So far, the petition has more than 19,000 signers. In addition, many Public Citizen supporters who also are Schwab customers have told us that they spoke directly to their brokerage firm.

For more than a year, Schwab has been locked in a battle with the industry regulatory body, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), over the class action ban Schwab added to its contract in violation of FINRA rules. A hearing panel had ruled in favor of Schwab, permitting it to maintain the provision and citing the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2011 decision in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion. (The case essentially permitted corporations to insert class action bans within pre-dispute forced arbitration clauses buried in consumer and employment contracts.) FINRA announced that it would appeal the hearing panel’s decision.

Schwab said it would remove the provision until “the issue is resolved by the appropriate regulatory and/or court decisions.” Even if a court ultimately rules for Schwab, Schwab should not put the class-action bans back into its investor contracts.

This is why it is crucial for the Securities and Exchange Commission to exercise its authority to conduct rulemaking and restore investors’ right to choose how to resolve disputes with financial firms. The fine print of one-sided contracts should not deny investors this critical right.

In the meantime, Schwab’s responsible decision is a significant victory for its customers and millions of ordinary investors. By speaking up, investors ensured that their ability to seek redress for losses caused by corporate misconduct would not be eliminated without a fight.

###

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.