Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

May 2, 2013

Consumer and Investor Groups Urge SEC to Restrict Forced Arbitration in Investor Contracts

Dodd-Frank Gives SEC Authority to Stop Brokers From Forcing Investors to Give Up the Right to Go to Court

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) should end the use of pre-dispute forced arbitration clauses in contracts that investors enter into with brokerage firms and investment advisors, 16 consumer and investor groups wrote in a letter to SEC Chairman Mary Jo White today. This authority is expressly granted in the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and would help reverse a larger trend of the securities industry using contractual fine print to force investors out of the courts and into private arbitration forums that often favor the investment firms.

The letter is in step with a similar move by U.S. Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) and 36 other members of the Senate and House of Representatives who called on White to protect the investing public by prohibiting forced arbitration clauses from being included in brokerage contracts.

The groups signing today’s letter include AARP, Americans for Financial Reform, American Association for Justice, Center for Justice & Democracy, Citizen Works, Consumer Action, Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, DC Consumer Rights Coalition, Homeowners Against Deficient Dwellings, National Association of Consumer Advocates, National Association of Shareholder and Consumer Attorneys, National Consumers League, Public Citizen, U.S. Public Interest Research Group, and Workplace Fairness.

Forced arbitration clauses are hidden in the fine print of the overwhelming majority of contracts that investors enter into with broker-dealers and investment advisors to receive financial services. Forced arbitration and bans on class actions shield firms from being held accountable for practices that harm large numbers of investors but where each financial injury is too small for most individuals to seek redress on their own.

“For too long, investors have had to surrender their right to seek redress in court,” said Christine Hines, Public Citizen’s consumer and civil justice counsel. “Given recent industry actions to further restrict legal protections, the time is ripe for the SEC to act.”

Specifically, Charles Schwab is leading the race to the bottom in further dismantling investor protection. Schwab has been battling with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) for the past year over whether Schwab can insert class-action bans within the forced arbitration clauses in its contracts. According to FINRA, contracts with the ban on class actions were sent to almost 7 million Schwab customers. A petition by Public Citizen now has almost 19,000 signatures calling for Schwab to stop denying its customers their basic right to access the court system.

“Brokerage firms were responsible for many fraudulent actions that led to or arose from the financial crisis,” the groups said in today’s letter, naming Schwab as one of the offenders identified by the SEC. “Ensuring that investors can choose the forum in which to resolve disputes with broker-dealers and investment advisors is critical both to remedying those past abuses and deterring future misconduct.”

Section 921 of the Dodd-Frank law specifically authorizes the SEC to prohibit or limit the imposition of forced arbitration by securities dealers when such limitation would be in the interest of the public and investors.

“If the SEC issues this rule,” Hines said, “it will be able to get some assistance from private investors in terms of holding corporations accountable.”

“Congress is aware of the integral role of private enforcement in protecting the integrity of the securities market,” the groups wrote. “It realized that the SEC alone cannot combat the fraud and malfeasance that can run rampant at the hands of insatiable market participants.”

The letter is available here.

###

© 2013 Public Citizen • 1600 20th Street, NW / Washington, D.C. 20009 • unsubscribe

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.