Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

March 20, 2013

Public Citizen Condemns House Agriculture Committee’s Reckless Disregard of Financial Calamity in Approving Wall Street Deregulation

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Approval today by the House agriculture committee of six bills to gut or stall important Wall Street reforms demonstrates reckless disregard of the financial crash of 2008 and the Senate’s just-released dissection of JPMorgan’s so-called London Whale gambling loss of $6.2 billion.

Last week, Republicans, led by U.S. Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), joined with Democrats on the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations to issue a scathing rebuke of trading activity by JPMorgan, the world’s largest bank. The report reveals mismanagement, deception, book-cooking and regulatory neglect. The London Whale lost more than $6 billion of depositor funds through JPMorgan’s London office on a bet about the direction of bond prices.

This week, Republicans on a House committee unanimously approved half a dozen bills to reduce Wall Street prudential obligations and oversight authority of Washington regulators of the derivatives market.

“We have to hope these House members just didn’t read the Senate report,” said Bartlett Naylor, financial policy advocate for Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “Otherwise, they wouldn’t have been so irresponsible.”

Seventeen House Democrats opposed one measure that would prevent U.S. regulatory oversight of American operations in London. Ranking Democrat Colin Peterson (D-Minn.) argued against deregulating London Whale-type trades, but Rep. David Scott (D-Ga.) joined with Republicans to approve the Wall Street-lobbied measure.

The committee also approved a misguided measure to force additional analysis of all rules (in addition to many other requirements). “This will further enable Wall Street to use the courts to delay and even block regulatory oversight,” said Amit Narang, regulator policy counsel for Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division.

In 2011, in response to a lawsuit, a U.S. court rejected a rule from the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the fear of more litigation like it has helped to slow implementation of the 2010 Wall Street Reform Act. Agencies have issued only a third of the rules required by Dodd-Frank. Additional analysis requirements are not needed.

The committee also approved a bill repealing the Wall Street reform that prevented derivatives trading within a financial firm’s federally insured bank. The 2010 reform, dubbed the “Lincoln amendment” for former Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), required that this activity be conducted in separately capitalized subsidiaries and that losses could not be covered by funds from the firms’ bank affiliate.

“Last year, this measure was dubbed the ‘Swaps Bailout Prevention Act.’ At least the bill’s authors have dropped this disingenuous title for a measure that actually authorizes such bailouts,” Naylor said. “The full House should consider the evidence from the Senate and recall the $12 trillion in damage from the financial crash of 2008 as they vote on these dangerous measures.”

###

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.