Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Dan Hockensmith, Communications Officer (Global Trade Watch)
w. (202) 454-5108
dhockensmith@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

Jan. 11, 2013

Government’s Latest Nuclear Waste Plan Creates More Problems Than Solutions

Statement of Allison Fisher, Outreach Director, Public Citizen’s Energy Program

Jan. 11, 2013

The Department of Energy’s “Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste,” sent today to Congress, is ill-conceived and risky. Central to the government’s strategy is a plan to move radioactive waste to centralized interim storage sites until a location for a national geological repository can be established.

More than 170 national and local organizations from all 50 states reject the core of this plan. (View the organizations’ Principles on Safeguarding Nuclear Waste at http://www.citizen.org/documents/PrinciplesSafeguarding2009.pdf.)

Centralized “interim” storage creates de facto permanent waste sites and unnecessary risks to the public without solving the fundamental public health and security threats posed by current on-site storage.

While on-site storage is not a permanent solution, it is the best medium-term option for addressing the serious and urgent security and safety threats posed by current irradiated fuel storage. We have called for safeguarding irradiated fuel at reactor sites while we look for a long-term management alternative. These safeguards include reducing the amount of irradiated fuel assemblies in spent fuel pools – 75 percent of spent fuel is packed into cooling pools that are beyond capacity and lack proper containment – and transferring this waste to more secure, on-site storage facilities.

Moving our country’s stockpile of radioactive waste to interim storage sites would increase the total number of nuclear waste sites, as nuclear power plants would still have to store waste too hot to transport. In addition, it would create transportation risks; would increase the cost of managing nuclear waste; and would potentially place the burden of waste storage on low-income communities of color located near existing Department of Energy sites and Native American communities, which typically have been targeted for radioactive waste storage sites due to weaker regulatory requirements and dire economic situations.

Transporting 68,000 metric tons of commercial nuclear waste to interim storage sites is not a valid response to our nuclear waste problem. The primary focus of the administration should be resolving the glaring safety and security issues surrounding nuclear waste storage at our country’s 72 nuclear power plants, not creating new issues.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.