Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Symone Sanders, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch division
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Oct. 5, 2012

New eBay User Policy Is Underhanded, Conflicts With Company’s Commitment to Openness, Letter and Petition Say

Company Should Remove New Forced Arbitration and Anti-Class Action Clauses From User Agreement

WASHINGTON, D.C. – eBay Inc. should remove from its terms of service new language that forces users to give up their right to go to court and prevents people from banding together in class actions, Public Citizen President Robert Weissman said in a letter sent today to the San Jose, Calif.,-based company.

The forced arbitration and anti-class action clauses that eBay recently added to its terms of service disproportionately favor the company in disputes, Weissman said. Most eBay users accept the take-it-or-leave-it contract language without reviewing it, and most don’t understand that the forced arbitration clause means they will be shut out of court if they are harmed by company misconduct, particularly when large numbers of users each suffer small-dollar losses.

Worse, the only way people can opt out of eBay’s new forced arbitration clause is by signing and sending a letter by traditional snail-mail – a strange requirement for a company whose entire business platform is online, the letter said.

 “To put it charitably, eBay’s requirement that opt-outs be submitted through traditional mail raises questions about the sincerity of its commitment to permitting users to protect themselves,” Weissman said.

On Sept. 15, eBay emailed users notifying them about unilateral changes eBay made to its terms of use on Aug. 21. These changes include an Agreement to Arbitrate, which forces users to accept binding arbitration as their exclusive means to resolve disputes with eBay and permits them to pursue claims against eBay on an individualized basis only, unless they opt out by Nov. 9.

Public Citizen is launching a petition drive to inform users of the new terms of service language as well as gather their support against it. As part of this launch, Public Citizen will help facilitate the opt-out process by providing a form that can be easily filled out online and then printed for sending. 

Public Citizen calls on eBay to remove the forced arbitration and anti-class action language from the terms of service immediately.
If the company refuses to remove the forced arbitration language, it should at least eliminate the anti-class action provisions, because they make it virtually impossible for users to recover money lost in low-dollar disputes. The company also should provide an online opt-out option.

Public Citizen also asks eBay to forward to users a message from Public Citizen explaining why users should exercise their opt-out rights.
 “Companies that respect and value their consumers don’t trick them into giving up their rights.” Weissman said. Adding, “eBay should drop its plans to keep aggrieved users from banding together and bringing their claims in court.”

To read the letter and petition, click here.

Copyright © 2015 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.