Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767
dowens@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742
drosen@citizen.org

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108
nflorko@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

Sept. 20, 2012  

Senate Banking Hearing Highlights Dangers of High-Frequency Trading, Underscores Need for Financial Speculation Tax

Note: The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs Subcommittee on Securities, Insurance, and Investment is holding a hearing at 10 a.m. today titled, “Computerized Trading: What Should the Rules of the Road Be?” in 538 Dirksen Senate Office Building.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The implementation of a financial speculation tax could help counteract both the predatory practices and the instability that are rampant in the market as a result of high-frequency trading, Micah Hauptman, financial campaign coordinator for Public Citizen said in written testimony submitted to lawmakers today.

A miniscule financial speculation tax on the sale or transfer of stocks, bonds and derivatives, such as one called for by the Wall Street Trading and Speculators Tax Act (S. 1787, H.R. 3313), introduced by U.S. Sen. Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) and U.S. Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), would “throw sand in the gears” of high-frequency trading operations by making their activities less profitable, ultimately reducing the likelihood of such operations distorting markets, Hauptman said.

High-frequency traders often pay exchanges for the ability to receive information at a faster rate than other market players. They are then able to exploit these advantages using high-powered computer technology to capture profit. Just last week, the New York Stock Exchange agreed to pay a $5 million settlement to the Securities and Exchange Commission for providing such an unfair advantage.

 According to the testimony, high-frequency trading carries several risks, including potential harm to traditional investors such as those holding mutual funds. High-frequency traders exploit technology to gain an advantage over traditional investors, sometimes even manipulating the prices of equities by making millions of false transactions. A financial speculation tax could protect the millions of investors whose retirement savings are held in such investment vehicles.
 
 Another serious concern highlighted in the testimony is high-frequency trading’s potential for instability. Events such as the May 2012 “flash crash” and the more recent Knight Capital debacle show the potential for danger when the complex computer algorithms used in high-frequency trading go awry. A financial speculation tax would slow down high-frequency operations to a more controllable level.

Also, a financial speculation tax has the potential to raise hundreds of billions of dollars. For example, the nonpartisan Joint Committee on Taxation scores the Harkin-DeFazio bill as generating more than $350 billion over 10 years. In this time of fiscal hardship, the revenue that a financial speculation tax could raise must not be overlooked.

“High-frequency trading contributes to a misallocation of resources, encouraging short-term speculation while stifling productive long-term investment,” said Hauptman. “We urge Congress to consider a financial speculation tax. With altered incentives, short-term speculative trading would decline and traditional long-term investment would flourish.”

To read Hauptman’s full testimony, visit http://www.citizen.org/documents/hauptman-testimony-on-computerized-trading.pdf.

 

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

You can support the fight for greater government and corporate accountability through a donation to either Public Citizen, Inc., or Public Citizen Foundation, Inc.

Public Citizen lobbies Congress and federal agencies to advance Public Citizen’s mission of advancing government and corporate accountability. When you make a contribution to Public Citizen, you become a member of Public Citizen, showing your support and entitling you to benefits such as Public Citizen News. Contributions to Public Citizen are not tax-deductible.

Public Citizen Foundation focuses on research, public education, and litigation in support of our mission. By law, the Foundation can engage in only very limited lobbying. Contributions to Public Citizen Foundation are tax-deductible.