Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Sept. 5, 2012      

Public Citizen Sues FDA for Failing to Act on Request to Ban Dangerous Dose of Alzheimer’s Drug Aricept

FDA Ignoring Its Own Findings That Higher Dose Poses Grave Risks But Is No More Effective Than Lower Dose

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has dragged its feet for too long on a petition calling on the agency to stop allowing the drug Aricept to be marketed at doses that can cause severe – and even fatal – side effects, Public Citizen said in a lawsuit filed today. The suit asks the court to compel the FDA to act.

The suit follows a petition from Public Citizen in May 2011 urging the FDA to immediately remove from the market a 23 milligram (mg) dose of Aricept and to add to lower-dosage (5 mg and 10 mg) forms of Aricept and the generic counterpart, donepezil, warnings against use at a higher dosage. The agency has yet to act on the petition.

Aricept was approved in 1996 as a treatment for Alzheimer’s at a dose of 5 or 10 mg daily. Before the patent expired in November 2010, the drug maker, Eisai, sought approval for a 23 mg version, on which it would have an additional period to market without generic competition.

A study presented to the FDA in 2009 failed to show that the 23 mg version was more effective than lower doses. But the high dose was associated with a much higher incidence of vomiting, which, in patients with Alzheimer’s disease, according to the FDA, “can lead to pneumonia, massive gastrointestinal bleeding, esophageal rupture or death.”

Based on the study results, the primary medical reviewer at the FDA recommended that agency deny the company’s application to market the higher-dose 23 mg version of the drug. That recommendation was rejected by the director of the FDA’s Division of Neurology Products, Dr. Russell G. Katz. The approval allowed Eisai to market Aricept 23, exclusively, for three years.

Public Citizen is asking that the court declare unlawful the FDA’s failure to act on Public Citizen’s petition and order the FDA to issue a decision on the petition.

“A primary function of the FDA is to protect citizens from harm caused by needlessly dangerous drugs, in this case a drug no more effective but significantly more dangerous than the lower doses of Aricept,” said Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group. “By ignoring Public Citizen’s petition for more than a year, the agency has ignored this responsibility and instead has chosen to support the profit interests of a large pharmaceutical company. During the past year alone approximately 350,000 prescriptions have been filled in the U.S. for Aricept 23, with total sales of $91 million. Allowing Esai to exploit and harm vulnerable patients with Alzheimer’s disease is unconscionable.”

To read the full text of the lawsuit, visit http://www.citizen.org/documents/PC-v-FDA-Aricept-Complaint.pdf.

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.