Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

8/28/12

Texas Medical Board Denies Validity of Critical Report But Fails to Support its Claims With Evidence to the Contrary 

Public Citizen’s Analysis of Physician Oversight Rankles State Officials

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Public Citizen has struck a nerve with the Texas Medical Board, a reaction that may turn out to be just what is required for officials to take notice that funding for physician oversight desperately needs to be reformed.

For more than 20 years, Public Citizen has annually ranked state medical boards on the basis of the rate of serious disciplinary actions (license revocation, suspension, surrender or probation) taken per 1000 licensed physicians in that state by analyzing data in the National Practitioner Data Bank. In a letter and accompanying report to Texas Gov. Rick Perry on Aug. 22, the organization revealed that 459 Texas physicians who had already been sanctioned by the state’s hospitals, HMOs or other health care institutions – some multiple times – had yet to be disciplined by the state medical board.

“The Texas board hotly, but inaccurately, denied the report’s validity, thereby bringing more deserved attention to the fundamental issue of inadequate discipline of Texas physicians,” said Dr. Sidney Wolfe, director of Public Citizen’s Health Research Group. “Fifty-eight percent of Texas doctors sanctioned for serious offenses by hospitals and other healthcare institutions  are free to practice as if nothing happened because the medical board has not been doing its job and, in the process, has left patients in the dark about their doctor’s history.”

The medical board was so intent on a swift denial that it issued its response within hours, however it tried to refute part of the wrong report, one Public Citizen generated in March 2011. Even more outlandish is the fact that the board denied its own key evidence, previously shared with Public Citizen, that insufficient funding prevents them from keeping up with the increasing volume of complaints. The board receives only a third of the $30 million it collects from doctors annually in licensing fees, professional fees and fines. The state takes the rest for use in the general fund, apparently preferring to fatten those coffers than protect Texas patients from dangerous doctors.

To read our response to the Texas Medical Board’s allegations, visit http://www.citizen.org/hrg2067.
 
To read the Aug. 22 letter and report, visit http://www.citizen.org/hrg2063.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.