Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Symone Sanders, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch division
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


July 7, 2011

Abhorrent Attack on Consumer Product Safety Legislation In House Subcommittee Hearing

Regulations Protect Consumers, Must Not Be Weakened

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The change of focus in today’s House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations hearing entitled “The Views of the Independent Agencies on Regulatory Reform” fooled no one, Public Citizen said.

The hearing originally was supposed to focus on encouraging independent agencies to conduct voluntary reviews of existing rules that may be outdated or no longer effective, but it quickly devolved into a partisan assault on regulations that are fundamental to protecting the public.

“Just as expected, the committee members used the hearing as another opportunity to bash the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and vital components of the 2008 overhaul law, including the online, public database of consumer complaints,” said Christine Hines, consumer and civil justice counsel with Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division.
Consumer Product Safety Commissioner Robert Adler informed the committee in his opening testimony that the commission had in fact “conducted a review of every safety rule under our jurisdiction.” Not surprisingly, this did little to appease the majority members of the committee.

“The Republicans did a poor job of veiling their intentions with this hearing: Their goal was clearly to attack consumer product safety legislation that was enacted with overwhelming bipartisan support,” said Amit Narang, regulatory policy advocate with Public Citizen’s Congress Watch division. “The easiest way for them to undercut laws they oppose is to block agencies from implementing or enforcing them. Laws that protect the public from harm, like the popular consumer product safety legislation, are useless if agencies aren’t allowed to do their jobs.”

The congressional attacks are to be expected, given intense opposition to a strong CPSC among the Washington, D.C., manufacturing lobby. The National Association of Manufacturers has spent more than $2 million lobbying in the first quarter of 2011 and has listed the product safety database as one of its top lobbying priorities.

“Some lawmakers are eager for agencies to look back and reconsider the value and effectiveness of their regulations,” Hines said. “But for product safety, the CPSC doesn’t need to ‘look back’ far to see the harm of under-regulation. A record number of recalls of consumer products in 2007 provoked Congress to pass a law with specific mandates to reinvigorate a poorly resourced and managed agency.”

Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.citizen.org.



Copyright © 2015 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.