Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Dan Hockensmith, Communications Officer (Global Trade Watch)
w. (202) 454-5108
dhockensmith@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

 May 17, 2011  

Congress Must Undo Damage of U.S. Supreme Court’s Latest Anti-Consumer Decision 
 
Statement of Public Citizen Attorney Deepak Gupta on the Introduction the Arbitration Fairness Act

Note: This statement was delivered at a press conference this morning.

 I’d like to thank Sens. Al Franken (D-Minn.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) and Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) for inviting me here this morning. My name is Deepak Gupta and I’m an attorney at Public Citizen. I argued before the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the consumers in AT&T v. Concepcion.

In Concepcion, the court ruled, 5-to-4, that companies may used forced arbitration clauses in their contracts with consumers and employees to ban class actions.

The court’s decision, by Justice Antonin Scalia, was handed down in the middle of a crowded news cycle – dominated by talk of the royal wedding, tornadoes, birth certificates and Osama bin Laden. And it involves seemingly abstract concepts – arbitration, class actions, pre-emption – that you may not think have much to do with your life.

 But make no mistake. Concepcion will affect all of us. Most of us don’t know about forced arbitration clauses, but we’re confronted by them every day. Now, whenever you sign a contract to get a cellphone, open a bank account or take a job, you may be giving up the right to hold companies accountable for illegal practices.

The result will be more hidden fees and charges on your cellphone bill, more predatory lending, more discrimination – in short, a less just society.

Concepcion is just the latest in a string of unjust Supreme Court decisions on forced arbitration. In case after case, the court has stacked the deck against consumers and employees. Last year, for example, in a case called Rent-a-Center v. Jackson, the court said that companies can write their contracts so that the companies’ own arbitrator decides whether it’s fair to submit a case to that arbitrator. 

It is now clear that a five-justice majority on the court is committed to turning the Federal Arbitration Act of 1925 – a law whose goal was to help facilitate voluntary arbitration between businesses – into a shield against corporate accountability. 

 Only Congress can step in and undo the damage. Only Congress can say to the Supreme Court: Enough is enough. Arbitration can be an acceptable alternative to the court system when it’s voluntary, but it should never be an excuse to use the fine print to block the courthouse doors.

###
Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.citizen.org.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.