Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

May 6, 2011

After Senate Republican Retreat on Elizabeth Warren, President Should Nominate Her Immediately and, if Necessary, Appoint Her During Next Senate Recess

Statement of David Arkush, Director, Public Citizen’s Congress Watch Division

On Thursday, 44 Senate Republicans sent a letter to President Barack Obama stating that they will oppose any nominee to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) unless the agency is first weakened dramatically. If there was any doubt that these senators are siding with Wall Street over ordinary Americans or that the senators simply oppose protecting American consumers and small businesses from abuses in the marketplace, that doubt now has been removed.

This letter is a failed attempt at misdirection. There is a strong, growing belief in Washington that the president will nominate Elizabeth Warren, currently a special adviser to the Treasury Department, to head the CFPB. Senate Republicans would be foolish to fight her publicly, and they know it. They would lose the fight – and would only strengthen Warren, the CFPB and the president.

So the senators are pretending the fight is about something else. They say they would oppose any nominee, not just Warren, because the agency is structurally flawed. They are forcing the president to make a recess appointment, which they will use to claim that he and the agency are unaccountable and undemocratic. Their arguments about the agency are specious, as recent congressional debate has shown. It is clear that they simply oppose a strong consumer protection agency.

The senators’ position is an embarrassment. After the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, at a time when millions of Americans have been thrown out of their homes and millions more are jobless, these 44 senators are steadfastly attempting to block a critical solution to the problems: a single agency that will look after consumers in the financial markets, amidst a sea of regulators that work for banks. Two of the senators, Sens. Susan Collins and Olympia Snowe, both Republicans from Maine, voted to approve the CFPB in its current form less than a year ago. Their decision to sign the letter is mystifying – and is likely to draw ire from voters.

The Senate Republicans’ strategic gambit likely leaves Obama no choice but to appoint a CFPB director during a Senate recess. It also leaves him no reason to appoint anyone but the strongest candidate: Elizabeth Warren. That is a good thing.

But the president shouldn’t wait until the next Senate recess. He should jump-start the debate that Wall Street and its congressional allies fear by nominating Warren immediately and touting her and the CFPB loudly. The Senate should hold hearings on her nomination right away. If Republicans continue to block her nomination, then the president should appoint her during the next Senate recess, the week of Memorial Day.

###
Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.citizen.org.

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.