Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Feb. 28, 2011

Don’t Let High Oil Prices Fool You – More U.S. Drilling Is Not the Answer

Statement of Tyson Slocum, Director, Public Citizen’s Energy Program

With oil prices briefly topping $100 per barrel, some are dusting off the tired “drill baby drill” playbook and calling for an expansion of domestic oil and gas drilling – ignoring the point that opening up access to the Pacific, Atlantic and eastern Gulf regions, which are currently off-limits to drilling, would not have a significant impact on domestic crude oil and natural gas production or prices before 2030.

The Energy Information Administration estimates that if the ban on drilling remains in place, the average U.S. price of motor gasoline will be three cents per gallon higher than if we open these areas to drilling. That’s because the U.S. isn’t Saudi Arabia; we sit on only 1.6 percent of the world’s oil reserves, while the Saudis have 20 percent. Dumping our little pond of oil into the giant sea of global reserves can’t make a significant dent on our imports or impact prices.

Some argue that recent unrest in Egypt and Libya present legitimate threats to supply and therefore justify the oil price run-up. While Libya is an oil exporter, Saudi Arabia already has lined up replacement exports, and protests have not hit that country.

What will make a significant dent in the short term is clamping down on the excessive speculation that’s driving the higher prices. To be sure, speculation has a necessary role, but it’s one thing for speculators to operate on the margins, and it’s quite another for them to dominate and drive the market. Congress understood this when it passed the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill last year, which, among other things, ordered the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to restore transparency to these energy trading markets. But under intense industry lobbying, the CFTC is punting on some of the more critical rules, including establishing firm position limits.

So here’s what Congress can do right away to address the problem:

1. Send clear orders to the CFTC that it needs to enact firm, binding position limits on traders, and require all trades to occur on exchanges fully regulated by the CFTC. This will limit the ability of speculators to continue to drive the market.

2. Minimize our exposure to oil prices by fully promoting plug-in electric vehicles, increasing fuel economy standards to 60 miles per gallon, fully funding mass transit and financing free transit service for two years to increase ridership.

3. Hold Big Oil accountable by repealing its existing tax breaks, reforming oil royalties and ensuring strong worker safety and environmental protection with drilling. This is something that the tea party ought to get behind, since Sarah Palin pushed through one of the largest tax increases in history on Big Oil when she was Alaska’s governor.

4. Impose a windfall profits tax to help finance an expansion of the hybrid car tax credit and mass transit investments.

Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.