Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Symone Sanders, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch division
w. (202) 454-5108
ssanders@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

 Jan. 27, 2011 

Environmentalists Who Spoofed Koch Industries Did Not Break Law, Should Not Be Identified, Public Citizen Tells Court

Parody Press Release and Website Were Political Speech, Protected by the First Amendment

 WASHINGTON, D.C. – A group of anonymous environmentalists who participated in an elaborate prank to highlight Koch Industries’ controversial role in bankrolling climate change denial did not infringe on Koch’s trademark and should not be identified, Public Citizen lawyers argued in papers filed late Wednesday in federal district court in Salt Lake City.

 Koch’s lawsuit against the anonymous activists does not justify unmasking their identities, Public Citizen said, and doing so would have a chilling effect on free speech.

 The anonymous members of Youth for Climate Truth issued a satirical press release on Dec. 10, posing as leading industrial company Koch Industries and announcing that the company had reversed its position on climate change. The press release announced that Koch would withdraw funding from groups “whose positions on climate change could jeopardize America’s continued global competitiveness in the energy and chemical sectors and Koch Industries’ ability to provide high-quality products and services to the American people.” The press release was also posted on a spoof website (www.koch-inc.com) designed to look like Koch’s (www.kochind.com). 

 That position contradicts Koch’s very public position on climate change policy. Koch Industries – which produces, transports and trades oil, coal and chemicals – has spent millions of dollars funding politicians, think tanks, foundations and political groups that have sought to either make the public doubt climate change or oppose climate change legislation directly. Koch has often been described as one of the country’s largest polluters.

 The spoof Koch website was live only for a few hours, and not a single reporter was fooled by the joke. Given the company’s outspoken views on climate change, reporters covering the press release immediately recognized that the company’s purported change in position was a hoax. The New York Times accurately described the site as a “spoof” and The Hill recognized it as “phony.”

Koch, however, was not amused. The company complained to the website’s host, Utah-based Bluehost.com, and the site was taken offline within hours of the issuance of the press release. Then, 18 days later, Koch filed a lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of Utah in Salt Lake City against the anonymous authors of the press release, alleging that they were guilty of trademark infringement, cybersquatting, unfair competition and violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, a criminal statute that penalizes those who hack into protected governmental and private computer systems. The company sought to identify the activists by sending subpoenas to Bluehost and FastDomain, which registered the spoof website. The bulk of Koch’s allegations apply only to commercial speech or activity, which this was not, Public Citizen’s brief said.

 “Although this case arises out of a harmless prank, it raises serious constitutional issues,” said Deepak Gupta, one of the Public Citizen attorneys defending the activists. “The First Amendment protects the right to engage in anonymous speech, especially political speech. Koch should not be able to unmask its political critics just because it can hire lawyers and file a lawsuit. The court should put a stop to Koch’s intimidation tactics.”

 Public Citizen’s papers ask the court to quash the subpoenas, forbid any use or disclosure of information that would identify the speakers and dismiss the lawsuit.

 To read the documents filed Wednesday, please visit http://www.citizen.org/documents/Koch_v_Does_Memo_Support_Motion_Quash.pdf and http://www.citizen.org/documents/Koch_v_Does_Motion_to_Quash_Subpoenas.pdf.

 For more information about Public Citizen’s work to protect First Amendment rights on the Internet, go to http://www.citizen.org/Page.aspx?pid=388.

###
Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.citizen.org.

 

 

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.