Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Dan Hockensmith, Communications Officer (Global Trade Watch)
w. (202) 454-5108
dhockensmith@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

May 10, 2010 

As Trade Again Becomes a Hot-Button Election Issue, Senate Candidates Pile Onto TRADE Act

Sen. Specter’s Support at Philly Event Underscores Growing Trend

WASHINGTON D.C. – Senator Arlen Specter’s (D-Pa.) announcement of support for the Trade Reform, Accountability, Development, and Employment Act (TRADE Act) today underscores a growing trend. Candidates are rushing to bolster their fair trade credentials as the damage of past trade policies on the U.S. economy becomes a hot-button election issue. And, the TRADE Act lays out requirements for trade expansion under terms that can deliver benefits to American workers, firms and farmers, said Public Citizen.

Pennsylvania has lost 299,508 manufacturing jobs since the implementation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization (WTO). This represents a loss of 34 percent of the state’s manufacturing jobs. The state has lost 94,800 jobs since 2001 due to unfair trade with China alone. The urgent need to replace America’s failed trade policy and create a new path forward to trade expansion has led almost all of Pennsylvania’s congressional delegation to co-sponsor the TRADE Act. Indeed, Pennsylvania had the largest number of original cosponsors to the bill, including Sen. Robert Casey and Representatives Jason Altmire, Robert Brady, Chris Carney, Kathy Dahlkemper, Mike Doyle, Tim Holden and Paul Kanjorski. Only two members – Reps. Joe Sestak (D) and Allyson Schwartz (D) – have not co-sponsored the bill.

 “Opposing the NAFTA-style trade model of the Bush-Clinton-Bush era and supporting the plan for job-creating trade expansion laid out in the TRADE Act is not only smart policy, it is also a political winner because, as we saw in the past two election cycles, this is a key demand of many Americans,” said Lori Wallach, director of Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch division. “For years, polling has shown that both Democrats and Republicans are fed up with our current trade policy, which has reaped huge profits for offshoring multinational corporations, big agribusiness firms, and Wall Street, while killing good jobs here, pushing down wages, and flooding our country with unsafe imports. They want to see their elected officials doing something about it.”

In the 2006 and 2008 elections, 72 House and Senate members who campaigned on trade reform replaced those who had voted for NAFTA and similar pacts. Meanwhile, the TRADE Act has 150 co-sponsors, including a majority of House Democrats. The House legislation is sponsored by 12 full committee chairs, 54 sub-committee chairs, Republicans and blocs of members from House caucuses that rarely agree on anything – including the Congressional Black (30 members), Hispanic (9), Blue Dog (23) and New Democrat (20) caucuses. Specter becomes the 10th sponsor of the Senate version of the bill, which was introduced later.
The TRADE Act provides a road map for delivering on the job-creation goals of President Barack Obama’s newly created National Export Initiative. The bill’s provisions are familiar to those who followed the 2008 campaign season. The TRADE Act captures the trade reforms promised in the 2008 Democratic platform and those committed to by Obama and many GOP and Democratic candidates who won congressional seats.

“Pennsylvania has been hit particularly hard by the current trade model,” Wallach said. “So it makes sense that almost all the members of the state’s congressional delegation are backing the TRADE Act, which would reform U.S. trade policy and create a new way forward for job-creating trade expansion.”

Across the country, Senate hopefuls have been piling onto the TRADE Act as they bolster their job-creation credentials. In the past month, Senate candidates Brad Ellsworth (D-Ind.) and Charlie Melancon (D-La.) have co-sponsored, and Illinois Senate candidate Alexi Giannoulias (D-Ill.) publicly pledged to co-sponsor the legislation.

At the Philadelphia event, organized by the Pennsylvania Fair Trade Coalition, Specter was bolstered by a diverse coalition of Pennsylvania labor, environmental, consumer, family farm, religious and other civil society groups. The event also honored the state’s “fair trade champions” in Congress.

###

Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit public interest organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.citizen.org.

 

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.