Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Dan Hockensmith, Communications Officer (Global Trade Watch)
w. (202) 454-5108
dhockensmith@citizen.org

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

April 22, 2010

Senate Must Strengthen Financial Reform, Bust Up Big Banks

Statement of Robert Weissman, President, Public Citizen 

President Barack Obama is absolutely right to insist that Congress, finally, get financial regulatory reform finished. And it’s tactically very smart to take the message to Wall Street and tell the financial titans that they will not be permitted to block reform any longer.

But the financial reform bill in the Senate in its present form is too weak to do the job of reining in Wall Street and preventing another financial crisis.

There are many elements that need to be added or improved, but the bill’s most glaring omission is its failure to break up the banks.

The mega financial institutions are now bigger than they were before the onset of the financial crisis. The simple solution is to order them to shrink.

The financial goliaths’ size gives them enormous political power, including the ability to thwart appropriate financial regulation.

Their enormous size and interconnectedness also is what gives them “too big to fail” status. While it is a good thing that the Senate bill includes authority for regulators to wind down failing megabanks, it is unlikely that this authority will be exercised, at least in times of crisis when many institutions are facing insolvency. Because of fear of the impact on the broader economy, the government will bail out these megabanks rather than let them fail. The only way to avert this problem is to make sure that institutions are not so big that their closure would threaten the financial system’s stability.

Because the market believes the biggest banks are “too big to fail,” they are able to borrow money at cheaper rates - a subsidy worth $34 billion a year, according to estimates by the Center for Economic and Policy Research.

We don’t need large banks to serve the broader economy; they introduce risk and provide inferior service. The largest banks dominate the risky derivatives market - with the top five commercial banks controlling 97 percent of the derivatives held by banks. And the largest
banks charge consumers more and serve communities less well.

Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), Ted Kaufman (D-Del.), Robert Casey (D-Pa.), Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) and Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) have introduced the SAFE Banking Act of 2010, which would impose caps on bank size and require the nation’s largest financial institutions to sell assets or spin off operations to come under the size cap.

For President Obama and Congress to deliver on the promise of bringing Wall Street and the big banks under control, it is imperative that the SAFE Banking Act be included in the final financial reform legislation.

###

Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit consumer advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.citizen.org.

 

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.