Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


April 12, 2010  

More Than 30 Organizations Call on Congress to Pass a Shareholder Protection Act

Corporate Political Spending Must Be Subject to Scrutiny

 WASHINGTON, D.C. – A diverse coalition of groups today called on Congress to require shareholder approval and full transparency of corporate spending promoting or attacking candidates. The groups, responding to an expected onslaught of unlimited corporate spending in elections, sent lawmakers a letter supporting the Shareholder Protection Act (H.R. 4790), sponsored by Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.).

 The call for a Shareholder Protection Act was made by 32 organizations from very diverse backgrounds, with concerns ranging from constitutional rights to campaign finance to financial services. “We have many different priorities, but we all agree that the Shareholder Protection Act constitutes an important part of an appropriate legislative response to the unprecedented Supreme Court decision, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission,” noted the groups.

 The Shareholder Protection Act would:

• Mandate an affirmative vote of a majority of all shareholders for approval of an annual political expenditure budget chosen by the management for a publicly held corporation;
• Require that each specific corporate political expenditure over a certain dollar threshold be approved by the board of directors and promptly disclosed to shareholders and the public;
• Require that institutional investors inform all persons in their investment funds how they voted on corporate political expenditures; and
• Post on the Securities and Exchange Commission Web site the amount each corporation is spending on elections and which candidates or issues they support or oppose.

 “We find this [Supreme Court] decision troubling in many ways,” said the groups in their letter. “In the electoral arena, this decision will bring a flood of new money into elections, ratcheting up the cost of campaigns and increasing the time and resources needed for fundraising. In the legislative arena, the mere threat of corporate political spending gives corporate lobbyists a large new club to wield when negotiating with lawmakers. In corporate governance, there are no rules or procedures established in the United States to ensure that shareholders – those who actually own the wealth of corporations – are informed of, or have the right to approve, decisions to spend their money on politics.”

 The groups are encouraging congressional leadership to make the Shareholder Protection Act part of its legislative package in response to the Citizens United decision, which is expected to be introduced this week.

 The coalition letter concludes: “The Shareholder Protection Act is a reasoned response to help offset some of the damage expected from the Citizens United decision. … Responsible corporate governance requires the involvement of informed shareholders, holding management accountable and ensuring that political spending decisions are made transparently and in pursuit of sound business.”

 The coalition letter and list of signatories is available at: http://www.citizen.org/documents/shareholder%20protection%20act%20org%20letter.pdf.

Signatories of the letter include:

Americans for Campaign Reform
A New Way Forward
Backbone Campaign
Blue America
Center for Corporate Policy
Chesapeake Climate Action Network
Citizen Works
Citizens Against Unlimited Corporate
Contributions (CAUC3)
Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in
Washington (CREW)
Common Cause
Consumer Watchdog
Corporate Accountability International
Corporate Governance
Green Century Capital Management
Greenpeace Holy Cross International Justice Office
Krull and Company
League of Conservation Voters
Maryknoll Office for Global Concerns
Organic Consumers Association
People for the American Way
Progressive Democrats of America
Public Campaign
Public Citizen
Robert Brooke Zevin Associates, Inc.
Wisconsin Democracy Campaign



Copyright © 2017 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


You can support the fight for greater government and corporate accountability through a donation to either Public Citizen, Inc., or Public Citizen Foundation, Inc.

Public Citizen lobbies Congress and federal agencies to advance Public Citizen’s mission of advancing government and corporate accountability. When you make a contribution to Public Citizen, you become a member of Public Citizen, showing your support and entitling you to benefits such as Public Citizen News. Contributions to Public Citizen are not tax-deductible.

Public Citizen Foundation focuses on research, public education, and litigation in support of our mission. By law, the Foundation can engage in only very limited lobbying. Contributions to Public Citizen Foundation are tax-deductible.