Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Ben Somberg, Press Officer (regulatory matters)
w. (202) 588-7742
bsomberg@citizen.org, Twitter

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

April 12, 2010  

Citizens United Against Citizens United: Public Citizen Takes Next Step in Fighting Corporate Power in Elections

New Web Site Highlights Continued Efforts to Mitigate Effects of U.S. Supreme Court’s Decision

WASHINGTON, D.C. – With thousands of people across the country uniting against the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in the case Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Public Citizen today launches the Web site CitizensUnitedAgainstCitizensUnited.org.

There’s reason to suspect that the organization that brought the Supreme Court case – Citizens United – is unhappy about the massive public outrage over the decision –and that it doesn’t want anyone pointing out the reality that citizens are uniting against Citizens United.

   Citizens United Against Citizens United was originally a Facebook group created by the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign. The idea was to use Facebook to organize people opposed to the Citizens United decision, which gave corporations the right to spend unlimited funds to influence federal elections.

But Citizens United sent a threatening letter to the Wisconsin organization alleging trademark infringement and demanded it stop using the name “Citizens United” in its Facebook campaign.

Public Citizen offered its legal resources to defend the Wisconsin group, but,
not wanting the hassle of litigation, the group instead dropped the name and renamed its Facebook group. Public Citizen decided the name Citizens United Against Citizens United was too good to go to waste and created a Web site with that name. The site urges visitors to take a stand against corporate influence in elections and calls for a constitutional amendment to overturn the Supreme Court ruling.

 “Citizens United, the court case, debased the First Amendment by saying corporations have a constitutional right to spend whatever they like to influence elections,” said Robert Weissman, president of Public Citizen. “Now Citizens United, the organization, sees fit to bully another organization into sacrificing legitimate free speech rights. Public Citizen believes in the First Amendment, and we aim to defend it against a reckless Supreme Court decision and a hypocritical advocacy group.”

 Citizens United is gearing up to get involved in the upcoming campaign season; the organization recently sent out an e-mail with job descriptions for two documentary producers to make pieces leading up to the 2010 elections.

“We’re already beginning to see the effects of Citizens United, with states throwing out restrictions on corporate election spending, the Chamber of Commerce stuffing its coffers to run election ads later this year, various political committees and advocacy groups clamoring for corporate contributions, and corporate insiders confirming that Citizens United signaled to business that there is no longer reason to exercise restraint in political spending,” Weissman said. “There's no time to waste in reasserting that our government must be of, by and for the people, not the corporations.” 

 Public Citizen has launched a petition drive for a constitutional amendment to clarify that corporations do not have free speech rights. The organization supports other efforts, like the Shareholders Protection Act introduced in the House of Representatives by Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.), which is designed to give shareholders a say over whether and how much corporations spend money on elections. Public Citizen also supports the Fair Elections Now Act, which would allow for public financing of federal elections.

 Should Citizens United come after Public Citizen as it did the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, Public Citizen is ready. Merely using the words “citizens united” in a URL does not constitute trademark infringement, according to Paul Alan Levy, a Public Citizen attorney who specializes in trademark law and Internet free speech.

 In addition to giving the background as to its namesake, the Web site also gives the history and context of both the Supreme Court case and Public Citizen’s stake in it.

For more information, visit www.CitizensUnitedAgainstCitizensUnited.org as well as Public Citizen’s petition site, www.DontGetRolled.org.

###
Public Citizen is a national, nonprofit public interest organization based in Washington, D.C. For more information, please visit www.citizen.org.
 

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.