Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716
bholzer@citizen.org

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779
kgower@citizen.org

Ben Somberg, Press Officer (regulatory matters)
w. (202) 588-7742
bsomberg@citizen.org, Twitter

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog
Facebook/publiccitizen

Follow us on Twitter

 

July 20, 2009

Minnesota Settlement With National Arbitration Forum Demonstrates Need for Congress to Curb Forced Arbitration

Statement of David Arkush, Director, Public Citizen’s Congress Watch Division

Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson’s settlement with the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) is a tremendous win for consumers. Public Citizen, which has long criticized NAF’s lack of neutrality as an arbitrator, is gratified that the company will no longer hear consumer disputes with credit card companies, banks and others.

For years, NAF has been the credit card industry’s go-to provider for credit card collection arbitrations. The Minnesota Attorney General’s lawsuit charged NAF with falsely claiming to be a neutral forum despite having corporate ties to large debt collection firms, treating major U.S. corporations as its clients and secretly collaborating with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to try to discredit reports on its bias, such as Public Citizen’s 2007 report showing that big corporations win 95 percent of the time before NAF.

The issues raised by the Minnesota lawsuit against NAF demonstrate the dangers of letting major corporations force consumers into private, secretive tribunals of their own choosing. The problem is much broader than NAF alone, extending to forced arbitration itself. Attorney General Swanson laudably recognized this in a July 19, 2009, letter to the American Arbitration Association (AAA), in which she urged AAA to abandon forced arbitration because it is a "fundamentally unfair" practice.

Only federal legislation can ensure that these events are not repeated and that another arbitration company does not step into the void left by NAF. Congress should protect consumers and employees by passing legislation to end forced arbitration once and for all. The Arbitration Fairness Act (H.R. 1020 and S. 931) would do just that. In addition, the Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act (H.R. 3126) would create an agency empowered to protect consumers from forced arbitration in contracts for financial products such as credit cards.

###

Copyright © 2014 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.


Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation

 

Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.

 

To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.