Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


July 15, 2009

Minnesota Attorney Generals Suit Shines Light on Unfair Arbitration Practices

Statement of David Arkush, Director, Public Citizen's Congress Watch Division

We applaud Minnesota Attorney General Lori Swanson for pursuing the National Arbitration Forum (NAF) for deceiving the public with claims of neutrality when, according to Minnesotas complaint, NAF is allied with debt collectors for the nations largest credit card providers. The allegations in the suit Minnesota filed Tuesday reinforce what many advocates of fair arbitration have known for a long time: Arbitration companies treat large corporations as their clients, collaborating with them to deprive consumers of their rights under critical consumer protection laws.

One of the allegations in the complaint is that the National Arbitration Forum, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and others have waged a coordinated effort to discredit Public Citizens 2007 report showing that big corporations win 95 percent of the time before NAF. The complaint also alleges that a New York hedge fund owns a major stake in both NAF and the countrys largest debt collection law firm, and that the hedge funds principals coordinated with NAF to try to kill or weaken the proposed Arbitration Fairness Act. The attorney generals allegations, if true, are two among many indicating that NAF has misled the public about its neutrality, only confirming Public Citizens reports.

Minnesotas lawsuit is an important effort to protect its citizens from the inherent corruption of the forced arbitration system. Congress must now protect all Americans by passing legislation to end forced arbitration. The Arbitration Fairness Act (H.R. 1020 and S. 931) would do just that, protecting consumers, employees and franchisees. The Consumer Financial Protection Agency Act (H.R. 3126) would create an agency that is empowered to protect consumers from forced arbitration in contracts for financial products like credit cards.

Minnesotas suit alleges violations of Minnesotas consumer-fraud, deceptive-trade-practices, and false-advertising laws. It comes as the U.S. House of Representatives considers H.R. 3126, sponsored by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), and the House and Senate consider H.R. 1020 and S. 931, sponsored by Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) and Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), respectively.


Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.