Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Feb. 12, 2009

Congress Must Level Playing Field Between Consumers and Corporations, Pass Arbitration Fairness Act

Statement of David Arkush, Director, Public Citizen’s Congress Watch Division*

With the re-filing today of the Arbitration Fairness Act, Congress again has the opportunity to empower victims of predatory, fraudulent and abusive practices. The Arbitration Fairness Act, sponsored by Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), would end the practice of forcing consumers, employees and franchise owners to sign away their rights to take disputes to court.

Most consumers don’t realize that when they sign up for a credit card, bank account, cell phone or any of numerous other services, they give up the right to take the service provider to court for wrongdoing. This is because the companies place binding mandatory arbitration clauses in the fine print of contracts to immunize themselves from accountability. These clauses require all disputes to go to secretive, private forums chosen by the company.

The Arbitration Fairness Act would allow all parties to a dispute to choose whether to go to arbitration or court.

There is little wonder why big business and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce oppose this bill. In many cases mandatory arbitration is akin to a rubber stamp for oppressive practices. Arbitration firms have a strong incentive to rule in favor of their clients – the corporations that choose them. Consumers in arbitration are stuck with costs far higher than those in court, and they must abide by the decision of arbitrators whose rulings are usually unreviewable by a judge, no matter how unfair they might be. As a result, many individuals lose the benefit of consumer protection and civil rights laws.

Congress should stand up for consumers and pass the arbitration bill. No company should be able to place itself above the law by stripping others of access to the courts. Consumers, employees and others who sign contracts deserve a choice on how they settle their disputes.

* Congress Watch is a department of Public Citizen. It is not a stand-alone organization. If you do not have space to include Mr. Arkush’s entire title, please refer to him as David Arkush of Public Citizen.


Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.