Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Don Owens, Deputy Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7767

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Nicholas Florko, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Dec. 15, 2004

Bush Economic Forum on U.S. Legal System Is a Rehash of Lies and Distortions From Election Campaign

Nonpartisan, Independent Data Show That Businesses File Four Times as Many Lawsuits as Consumers, There Is No “Tort Tax” and Lawsuit Filings Are Down

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Contrary to what President Bush is likely to hear at a conference today, there is no credible economic rationale – conservative or otherwise – for taking away the legal rights of consumers and patients who are harmed by the abuses of big corporations and the negligence of medical providers, according to two analyses released today by Public Citizen.

The analyses cut through the economic fallacies and rhetoric of those who are trying to undermine consumers’ legal rights. They are available by clicking here and here.

The consumer advocacy group released the analyses as Bush prepared to participate in a panel on Wednesday called the “High Costs of Lawsuit Abuse,” part of a two-day White House Conference on the Economy. Like the rest of the conference, this panel is designed to showcase the president’s agenda and exclude any analysis or nonpartisan, independent facts that challenge his legislative goals. The term “lawsuit abuse” in the title is evidence of this panel’s bias; it was invented by the business lobby.

A serious discussion of the U.S. legal system would include the following facts from Public Citizen’s analyses:

  • The people who most take advantage of the legal system are the business interests lobbying to curtail citizen’s legal rights: U.S. businesses file lawsuits four times more often than individuals, according to an analysis of states and counties that keep such data. Moreover, businesses are 69 percent more likely to be sanctioned by federal judges for filing frivolous lawsuits than are tort plaintiffs and their attorneys, according to an analysis of the 100 most recent cases where such sanctions were imposed.
  • The frequently cited study that contends lawsuits cost taxpayers well over $200 billion per year (the so-called “tort tax”) has been repudiated by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). According to CBO, the costs estimated by Tillinghast-Towers Perrin “merely shift money from injurers to victims and thus are not true costs to society.” These “costs” are actually the total cost of the liability insurance industry, and they would not disappear even if the legal system did not exist. Overall, 46 percent of the tort cost estimate is for payments made to injured victims for lost wages, medical care, and pain and suffering. These costs are the result of injuries caused by defendants and would be borne by society anyway, through private health insurance, government programs and charities, or by being absorbed by victims and their families. And 21 percent of the tort cost estimate is for insurance industry overhead.
  • Tort lawsuit filings have decreased 9 percent overall from 1992 through 2001, according to a joint tracking project of the Conference of State Court Administrators, the Bureau of Justice Statistics and NationalCenter for State Courts. The filing data from 30 states represent a total of 74 percent of the U.S. population. When adjusted for population growth, tort filings declined by 15 percent, from 269 to 228 per 100,000 over that period.
  • According to independent researchers, the doctor population in states with increasing malpractice insurance premiums is rising – not declining. Further, medical malpractice costs are a very small fraction of overall health care costs and have virtually no effect on the rising costs of health care, and the administration’s claims of $25 billion in “defensive medicine” costs per year have no basis in fact.

“President Bush doesn’t let facts get in the way when it comes to his political goal of dismantling the legal system,” said Joan Claybrook, president of Public Citizen. “He prefers to coddle campaign contributors, rather than protect consumers and patients.”

Added Frank Clemente, director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch, “This is not a debate among reasonable people.   It is a massive campaign of distortions carried out by the administration in league with its business allies. The fact is, the emperor has no clothes.”


Copyright © 2016 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.