Learn more about our policy experts.

Media Contacts

Angela Bradbery, Director of Communications
w. (202) 588-7741
c. (202) 503-6768
abradbery@citizen.org, Twitter

Barbara Holzer, Broadcast Manager
w. (202) 588-7716

Karilyn Gower, Press Officer
w. (202) 588-7779

David Rosen, Press Officer, Regulatory Affairs
w. (202) 588-7742

Symone Sanders, Communications Officer, Global Trade Watch division
w. (202) 454-5108

Other Important Links

Press Release Database
Citizen Vox blog
Texas Vox blog
Consumer Law and Policy blog
Energy Vox blog
Eyes on Trade blog

Follow us on Twitter


Feb. 23, 2004

New Data Refute Link Between Medical Malpractice Lawsuits and OB/GYN Insurance Premium Hikes

Payments in Obstetrics Lawsuits Are Declining; Awards are Keeping Pace with Medical Inflation

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Federal government data show that the number of payments and the monetary amount of payments made to victims of obstetrical malpractice declined over the past decade, casting substantial doubt on the assertion that lawsuits are responsible for obstetricians’ insurance premium increases, according to a Public Citizen analysis.

Public Citizen issued the analysis in advance of a U.S. Senate vote on Tuesday on legislation that would limit the ability of women and children to hold medical providers accountable for negligence. The bill, S. 2061, would arbitrarily cap the amount of non-economic damages available to malpractice victims at $250,000 when obstetrical or gynecological care is involved.

Key findings from the analysis of National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB) records include the following:

  • The number of medical malpractice payouts made by OB/GYNs declined 13 percent from 1991 to 2002, dropping from 1,303 to 1,129. Moreover, the number of payouts declined 22 percent from 2001 to 2002 – the peak of the malpractice "crisis."
  • The median malpractice payout made to individuals by OB/GYNs declined by 9 percent from 1991 to 2002 when adjusted for medical inflation. In 1991, the median obstetrics malpractice payout in the United States was $175,000. By 2002 it had risen 51 percent, to $265,000. But the cost of medical care services rose by 65 percent over the same period. Both consumer advocates and the insurance industry have pointed to heath care inflation as a major factor in pushing up malpractice awards in recent years.
  • The total amount of malpractice payouts by OB/GYNs has remained nearly flat over the past decade when adjusted for medical care services inflation. In 1991 the total amount paid to settle malpractice claims against OB/GYNs in the United States was $326 million. In 2002 the total of malpractice payouts was $557 million. Adjusted for medical care services inflation, the 2002 figure would be $336 million – a .03 percent increase. Total payouts declined by 21 percent from 2001 to 2002 (not adjusted for inflation).

"All the numbers show that the insurance premium increases over the past year are not tied to lawsuits," said Joan Claybrook, president of Public Citizen. "The only number that correlates with the premium increases is the decline in malpractice insurers’ investment income."

The Senate bill’s proponents claim that obstetricians’ insurance rates are rising because of malpractice awards to patients, but rate increases are far outstripping increases in awards. Even obstetricians in states where awards are capped faced premium increases of up to 54 percent last year, according to the Medical Liability Monitor newsletter. Many insurers charge obstetricians higher rates in states where damages are capped even though payouts for medical malpractice damages are substantially lower in those states than in states without caps. For instance, Northwest Physicians Mutual charges Los Angeles obstetricians twice the premium it charges OB/GYNs in Seattle — even though the malpractice awards in California are half as large, on average, as those in Washington state.

"The data are clear – the legal system is not the problem," said Frank Clemente, director of Public Citizen’s Congress Watch. "Doctors and patients need to move beyond what we disagree about. We should develop patient safety programs that represent a win for both sides, rather than try to take away the legal rights of those who most need them."

The NPDB is a U.S. government agency that collects reports of every judgment or settlement paid to malpractice victims throughout the country by insurance companies on behalf of doctors.

Click here to view the full report and other materials about the Senate legislation.


Copyright © 2015 Public Citizen. Some rights reserved. Non-commercial use of text and images in which Public Citizen holds the copyright is permitted, with attribution, under the terms and conditions of a Creative Commons License. This Web site is shared by Public Citizen Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation. Learn More about the distinction between these two components of Public Citizen.

Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation


Together, two separate corporate entities called Public Citizen, Inc. and Public Citizen Foundation, Inc., form Public Citizen. Both entities are part of the same overall organization, and this Web site refers to the two organizations collectively as Public Citizen.

Although the work of the two components overlaps, some activities are done by one component and not the other. The primary distinction is with respect to lobbying activity. Public Citizen, Inc., an IRS § 501(c)(4) entity, lobbies Congress to advance Public Citizen’s mission of protecting public health and safety, advancing government transparency, and urging corporate accountability. Public Citizen Foundation, however, is an IRS § 501(c)(3) organization. Accordingly, its ability to engage in lobbying is limited by federal law, but it may receive donations that are tax-deductible by the contributor. Public Citizen Inc. does most of the lobbying activity discussed on the Public Citizen Web site. Public Citizen Foundation performs most of the litigation and education activities discussed on the Web site.

You may make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., Public Citizen Foundation, or both. Contributions to both organizations are used to support our public interest work. However, each Public Citizen component will use only the funds contributed directly to it to carry out the activities it conducts as part of Public Citizen’s mission. Only gifts to the Foundation are tax-deductible. Individuals who want to join Public Citizen should make a contribution to Public Citizen, Inc., which will not be tax deductible.


To become a member of Public Citizen, click here.
To become a member and make an additional tax-deductible donation to Public Citizen Foundation, click here.